Systematization of digitalization directions of higher education in Russia

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-103330
Open Access
Proceedings of the conference «University as a factor of Modernization of Russia: History and Prospects (to the 55th anniversary of the I.N. Ulyanov ChSU)»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Proceedings of the conference «University as a factor of Modernization of Russia: History and Prospects (to the 55th anniversary of the I.N. Ulyanov ChSU)»
Author:
Irina P. Iasnenko 1
Work direction:
Процессы цифровизации сферы образования
Pages:
337-341
Received: 13 September 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
1552
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Lomonosov Moscow State University
For citation:
Iasnenko I. P. (2022). Systematization of digitalization directions of higher education in Russia. University as a factor of Modernization of Russia: History and Prospects (to the 55th anniversary of the I.N. Ulyanov ChSU), 337-341. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-103330

Abstract

Scientific and technological progress and digitalization stimulate the dynamic development of Internet programs for the development of higher education in Russia. Digitalization has affected all aspects of the educational process, including: management, communications, a paradigm shift in education and a complete transformation of the traditional school of higher education. Digital methods of teaching in higher education are integrated into existing traditional training programs, there is a digital update of educational programs and disciplines. Mixed learning models are being created, distance education programs are being developed and implemented, a digital educational environment with system unified modules is being introduced, a digital approach to managing educational institutions has been established.

References

  1. 1. Зарипова Р.Р. Интерактивные Web 2.0-инструменты в интегрированном предметно-языковом обучении / Р.Р. Зарипова, Л.Л. Салехова, А.В. Данилов // Высшее образование в России. – 2017. – №1. – С. 78–83.
  2. 2. Кликунов Н.Д. Влияние сетевых технологий на трансформацию высшего образования в России / Н.Д. Кликунов // Высшее образование в России. – 2017. – №3. – С. 78–85.
  3. 3. Козина И.М. Концепция кейс-стади в социальных науках, и французская традиция монографических исследований трудовых организаций / И.М. Козина, Е.В. Сережкина // Социологические исследования. – 2015. – №1. – С. 65–73.
  4. 4. Малошонок Н.Г. Взаимосвязь использования Интернета и мультимедийных технологий в образовательном процессе со студенческой вовлеченностью / Н.Г. Малошонок // Вопросы образования. – 2016. – №4. – С. 59–83. – DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-59-83.
  5. 5. Минина В.Н. Цифровизация высшего образования и ее социальные результаты / В.Н. Минина // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология. – 2020. – Т. 13. Вып. 1. – С. 84–101. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.106
  6. 6. Роботова А.С. Преподаватель-гуманитарий в режиме E-Learning: «Волнения души» / А.С. Роботова // Высшее образование в России. – 2017. – №3. – С. 43–51.
  7. 7. Ракитов А.И. Высшее образование и искусственный интеллект: эйфория и алармизм / А.И. Ракитов // Высшее образование в России. Научно-педагогический журнал. – 2018. – №6. – С. 41–49.
  8. 8. Saykili A. Higher education in the digital age: The impact of digital connective technologies // Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning. – 2019. – №2 (1). – P. 1–15. – Doi: 10.31681/jetol.516971.
  9. 9. Tulinayo F.P. Digital technologies in resource constrained higher institutions of learning: a study on students’ acceptance and usability / F.P. Tulinayo, P. Ssentume, R. Najjuma // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. – 2018. – №15 (36). – P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239–018–0117-y

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.