En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Pedagogy, Psychology, Society
  4. The originality of the work of V. V. Nabokov "Set"

The originality of the work of V. V. Nabokov "Set"

Proceeding
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society»
Authors:
Elena A. Babenko 1 , Anzhela R. Fomina 1 , Diana A. Strigina 1
Work direction:
Филология в системе образования
Pages:
301-303
Received: 4 December 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
835
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Filial GBOU VO "Stavropol'skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii institut" v g. Budennovske
For citation:
Babenko E. A., Fomina A. R., & Strigina D. A. (2022). The originality of the work of V. V. Nabokov "Set". Pedagogy, Psychology, Society, 301-303. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article presents the results of the analysis of the content, compositional features of the work of V. V. Nabokov "Set" (1935) - a work that was a combination of traditional and non-traditional, which allowed the reader to look into the creative world of the author, to observe the process of the birth of the hero of a new work.

References

  1. 1. В.В. Набоков: pro et contra / В.В. Набоков. – СПб.: РХГИ, 1999. – С. 976.
  2. 2. Набоков В.В. Набор: новелла / В. В. Набоков // Электронная библиотека Bookscafe.Net», 2015–2022 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://bookscafe.net/read/nabokov_vladimir-nabor-47627.html#p3
  3. 3. Пурбуева И.Б. Жанровое своеобразие произведения В. Набокова «Набор» / И.Б. Пурбуева, О.А. Колмакова // Вестник Бурятского государственного университета. – 2017. – Вып. 3. – С. 56–59.
  4. 4. Теория литературы: учеб. пособие для студ. филол. фак. высш. учеб. заведений: в 2 т. / под ред. Н.Д. Тамарченко. – М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2004. – С. 368.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.