En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Strategies of Sustainable Development: Social, Law...
  4. Dynamics of public opinion towards Islamists in th...

Dynamics of public opinion towards Islamists in the Arab Republic of Egypt at the beginning of the 21st century

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-105446
Open Access
All-Russian Scientific Conference «Strategies of Sustainable Development: Social, Law and External-economic Aspects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific Conference «Strategies of Sustainable Development: Social, Law and External-economic Aspects»
Author:
Ekaterina L. Dubovetskaia 1
Work direction:
Современные тенденции развития мирового сообщества
Pages:
15-17
Received: 12 February 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1139
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Lomonosov Moscow State University
For citation:
Dubovetskaia E. L. (2023). Dynamics of public opinion towards Islamists in the Arab Republic of Egypt at the beginning of the 21st century. Strategies of Sustainable Development: Social, Law and External-economic Aspects, 15-17. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-105446

Abstract

The article describes the process of restructuring the Egyptian political field in the context of confrontation between representatives of the military elite and religious political movements in Egypt on the eve and after the events of the Arab Spring. The data of sociological surveys conducted by the Arab Barometer Center on the attitude of citizens towards Islamist parties and religious leaders in the MENA are analyzed. As a result of a comparative analysis of data for 2012–2014 with data obtained in 2018–2019, conclusions were drawn about a decrease in the level of trust of the population of the region in Islamists and a decrease in the level of religiosity in general. As a result of the historical analysis, the reasons that influenced this process are named, including the unsuccessful reforms of the Islamists and the rise of the extremist movement.

References

  1. 1. Орехов А.А. Идеологические поиски и структурная реорганизация в египетской Ассоциации «Братья-мусульмане» в 2013–2018 гг. / А.А. Орехов // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. – 2020. – №2. – С. 74–84.
  2. 2. Царегородцева И.А. Исламисты в политике Египта и Туниса после Арабской весны // Islamology. – Т. 7 №1. – М., 2017. – С. 122–137.
  3. 3. Abdul-Wahab Kayyali Arab Political Parties and the Dual Challenge of Trust // Arab Barometer, 2020 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://www.arabbarometer.org/2020/05/arab-political-parties-and-the-dual-challenge-of-trust/ (дата обращения: 10.02.2023).
  4. 4. Arabs are losing faith in religious parties and leaders // The Economist, 2019 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/12/05/arabs-are-losing-faith-in-religious-parties-and-leaders?fbclid=IwAR30Wut0Fm7cRGCURTWg_xwiYk1oXJGIVci9WG9n6GjJYUssLOqAgVTsfoI (дата обращения: 10.02.2023).
  5. 5. Khaled Fouad Militarization of Political Parties in Egypt. 2018 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://en.eipss-eg.org/militarization-of-political-parties-in-egypt/ (дата обращения: 12.12.2021).
  6. 6. Laurence Deschamps-Laporte From the Mosque to the Polls: The Emergence of the Al Nour Party in Post-Arab Spring Egypt // Brismes New Middle Eastern Studies. – 2014. – №4. – С. 4. – DOI: 10.29311/nmes.v4i0.2640
  7. 7. Naman Karl-Thomas Habtom Is the MENA Region Becoming Less Religious? An Interview with Michael Robbins // Arab Barometer, 2020 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://www.arabbarometer.org/2020/04/is-the-mena-region-becoming-less-religious-an-interview-with-michael-robbins/ (дата обращения: 10.02.2023).
  8. 8. Youssef El Chazli Sur les sentiers de la révolution: Comment des Égyptiens dépolitisés sont-ils devenus révolutionnaires? // Revue française de science politique. – 2012. – Vol. 62. №5–6. – C. 843–866. – ISSN 0035-2950.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.