Pozitivnoe razvitie molodezhi v kontekste semeinogo dosuga

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-105802
Open Access
Monograph «Modern Challenges of Education and Psychology of Personality Formation»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Modern Challenges of Education and Psychology of Personality Formation»
Author:
Aleksandr I. Kugai 1
Work direction:
Глава 4
Pages:
44-53
Received: 21 March 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
997
Published in:
РИНЦ
Cited by:
4 articles
1 Severo-Zapadnyi institut upravleniia FGBOU VO "Rossiiskaia akademiia narodnogo khoziaistva i gosudarstvennoi sluzhby pri Prezidente RF"
For citation:
Demidova T. E., Volkovitskaia G. A., Kulemina K. V., Fedorova O. V., Kugai A. I., Akoeva M. A., Dzhadzhieva K. B., Bashkireva T. V., Bashkireva A. V., Vinogradova I. A., Karmishina A. V., Belova I. L., Guriancheva E. N., Koreneva A. V., Gani S. V., Konstantinova N. I., Koreneva A. V., Kugai A. I., & Kugai A. I. (2023). Modern Challenges of Education and Psychology of Personality Formation, 176. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/a-10480

Abstract

The chapter highlights issues of a significant impact on teenagers’ development, identity, socialization and future life depending on how they spend their free time as it is an important transitional situation in adolescence, which helps to bridge the gap between childhood play and work in adulthood. Structured and organized programmes and activities create a beneficial environment for youth development. However, the home environment should be considered the first and, perhaps, the most important, in the context of the positive development of young people. One of the theoretical models that has been created as a useful basis for studying family leisure in recent years has become the core and balance model of the functioning of family leisure. The model based on family systems theory indicates that participation in various forms of family leisure contributes to the functioning of the family in different ways. People tend to seek stability and changes, variety, acquaintance and freshness in their leisure time. At the same time, studying the difference in responses of parents and young people showed that parents are more satisfied with their family life when they were involved in family leisure that was new and challenging, thereby addressing the family's need for change and promoting learning and improving adaptive skills and youth abilities. Young people, on the contrary, turned out to be more in need of stability, constancy and regularity in their preferences for family leisure.

References

  1. 1. Кугай А.И. Со-воспитательная роль городского пространства в социализации детей: Фламандский опыт / А.И. Кугай // Современные вызовы образования и психология формирования личности: монография. – Чебоксары: Среда, 2023. – С. 203–213.
  2. 2. Кугай А.И. «Цифровое поколение»: угрозы и надежды в эпоху информационно-цифровой цивилизации / А.И. Кугай // Управленческое консультирование. – 2019. – №7. – С. 90–99.
  3. 3. Кугай А.И. Основания государственной политики в сфере развития молодежного добровольческого движения / А.И. Кугай, А.С. Баранова // Научные труды Северо-Западного института управления РАНХиГС. – 2019. – С. 124–137.
  4. 4. Agate J., Zabriskie R., Agate S., & Poff R. Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 2009. N 41 (2), pp. 205–223.
  5. 5. Bahr S.J., & Hoffman J.P. Parenting style, religiosity, peers, and adolescent heavy drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2010. N 71 (4), pp. 539–543.
  6. 6. Badura P., Madarasova Geckova A., Sigmundova D., Sigmund E., Van Dijk J. P., & Reijneveld S.A. Can organized leisure-time activities buffer the negative outcomes of unstructured activities for adolescents’ health? International Journal of Public Health, 2018. N 63 (6), pp. 743–751.
  7. 7. Cindrić M. Izvannastavne i izvanškolske aktivnosti učenika osnovne škole [Extracurricular and out-of school activities of primary school students]. Život i škola. 1992. N 41 (1), pp. 49–68.
  8. 8. Christenson O., Zabriskie R., Eggett D., & Freeman P. Family acculturation, family leisure involvement, and family function ingamong Mexican-Americans. Journal of Leisure Research, 2006. N 38 (4), pp. 475–495.
  9. 9. Freeman P., & Zabriskie R. Leisure and family functioning inadoptive families: Implications for therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 2003. N 37 (1), pp.73–93.
  10. 10. Hutchinson S., Afi fi T., & Krause S. The family that plays together fares better: Examining the contribution of shared family time to family resiliency following divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 2007. N 46 (3/4), pp. 21–48.
  11. 11. Hornberger L., Zabriskie R., & Freeman P. Contributions of family leisure to family functioning among single-parent families. Leisure Sciences, 2010. N 32 (2), pp. 143–161.
  12. 12. Ilišin V. Slobodno vrijeme i interesi mladih [Leisure and the interests of youth]. In Ilišin V., & Radin F. (Eds.), Mladi: problem ili resurs. Institut za društvena istraživanja, 2007, pp. 179–201
  13. 13. Iso-Ahola A. Social psychological foundations of leisure and resultant implications for leisure counseling. In E. T. Dowd (Ed.), Leisure counseling: Concepts and applications. Springfi eld, IL: Charles C. Thomas. 1984. pp. 97–125.
  14. 14. Klein D., & White J. (1996). Family theories: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. 15. Little P., Wimer C., & Weiss H. B. After school programs in the 21st century: Their potential and what it takes to achieve it. Issues and opportunities in out-of-school time evaluation. Harvard Family Research Project, 2008. N 10, pp. 1–12.
  16. 16. McCormick B. The infl uences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 2001. N 50 (3), pp. 281–289.
  17. 17. Shaw S., & Dawson D. Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses on family activities. Leisure Sciences, 2001. N 23, pp. 217–231.
  18. 18. Sharp E.H., Coffman D.L., Caldwell L.L., Smith E.A., Wegner L., Vergnani T., & Mathews C. Predicting substance use behavior among South African adolescents: The role of leisure experiences across time. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2011. N 35 (4), pp. 343–351.
  19. 19. Silbereisen R.K., & Todt E. Adolescence – A matter of context. In R. K. Silbereisen, & E. Todt (Eds.), Adolescence in context: The interplay of family, school, peers, and work in adjustment. Springer-Verlag. 1994. pp. 3–21
  20. 20. White S.M., & Klein D.M. Family theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Zabriskie, R., 2008.
  21. 21. Witt P., & Caldwell L. Recreation and youth development. State College, PA: Venture, 2005.
  22. 22. Weybright E.H. Healthy leisure and its relationship to substance use in South AFRICAN adolescents: A variable and Person centered approach (PhD thesis). Pennsylvania State University, 2013.
  23. 23. Widmer M., Zabriskie R., & Loser R. Wholesome family recreation. In S. R. Klein & E. J. Hill (Eds.), Creating home as a sacred center Principles for everyday living Provo, UT: BYU Academic Publishing. 2005. pp. 205–215.
  24. 24. Zabriskie R., & McCormick, B. The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 2001. N 50 (3), pp. 281–289.
  25. 25. Zabriskie R., & McCormick, B. Parent and child perspectives of family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 2003. N 35 (2), pp.163–189.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.