En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. Vol 6, No 2
  4. Approbation of the Bachelor's preparation model fo...

Approbation of the Bachelor's preparation model for sports selection

Research Article
EDN: DSRJPP DOI: 10.31483/r-106442
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 6
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 6
Author:
Gennadii M. Nikolaev 1
Work direction:
Pedagogy and Modern Education
Pages:
57-62
Received: 19 April 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
2149
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Mari State University
For citation:
Nikolaev G. M. (2023). Approbation of the Bachelor's preparation model for sports selection. Development of education, 6(2), 57-62. EDN: DSRJPP. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-106442
UDC 378.14:796

Abstract

The great importance of sports selection to increase the interest and motivation of the younger generation to go in for sports, identify the most promising athletes, achieve the highest results in the chosen sport by athletes, increase the competitiveness of domestic athletes on the world stage, require the training of highly qualified specialists who are able to carry out sports selection at various stages of a long-term training process and in different types of sports disciplines. But, the complexity and multidimensionality of sports selection, due to the wide variety of sports, complicates the process of creating a unified methodology for sports selection. This produces difficulties in the training of specialists capable of competent and effective implementation of the sports selection methodology. To overcome the formed contradiction between the high need of society for the implementation of sports selection and the lack of qualified specialists in physical culture, ready for the full and effective implementation of the sports selection methodology, we conducted a study. The purpose of the study is the development and implementation of pedagogical conditions that ensure the functioning of the model for the formation of bachelors' readiness in the direction of preparation “Physical culture” for the implementation of the sports selection methodology. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the Mari State University in the period from 2017 to 2022, with the participation of 300 students of the Faculty of Physical Culture, Sports and Tourism. In the course of the study, the methods of theoretical analysis, pedagogical experiment, control tests, questionnaires, and the proximetric method were applied. Conclusions. The results were obtained, indicating that the implementation of the developed pedagogical conditions contributes to a significant increase in the motivational, cognitive, activity and reflexive readiness of bachelors in the direction of training “Physical culture” to implement the methodology of sports selection.

References

  1. 1. Bomin V. A., Kugno E. E., Kalashnikova R. V., Brel P. Yu., Savrasova K. A., & Savrasova A. A. (2022). Approaches and features of selection at the initial stage of training in athletics. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 3(205), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2022.3.p31-36. EDN: WBIKQL
  2. 2. Eliseev E. V. (2020). Theses of development and modernization of organization systems educational and educational-methodological work university of physical culture. Healthcare, Education, and Security, 1(21), 77–86. EDN: HTIIQL
  3. 3. Emel'yanova Yu. N. Emelyanov V. D., & Bachenina E. A. (2020). Features of the application of interactive technologies in the training of bachelors in the direction of physical education. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya, 68–1, 102–105. EDN: WPRAXV
  4. 4. Klimova E. N. (2019). K problemam realizatsii trebovaniy FGOS vysshego obrazovaniya v podgotovke bakalavrov na zanyatiyakh fizicheskoy kul'turoy. Vestnik sovremennykh issledovaniy, 1.11(28), 81–84. EDN: YWUBUT
  5. 5. Kruchinina G. A., & Sedov D. S. (2020). Teaching future bachelors in the field of “physical education” using digital technologies and project methods. Prepodavatel ХХ vek, 4–1, 235–236. https://doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2020-4-235-246. EDN: RJEWKR
  6. 6. Levchenko A. A. (2022). Unstable physical activity due to the epidemic. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 2 (204), 270–274. https://doi.org/10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2022.2.p270-274. EDN: HFNPIF
  7. 7. Loskutova E. A., & Loskutov A. V. (2014). Study of features motiatsii process of physical education in higher education. Fizicheskaya kul'tura, sport i zdorov'e, 24, 94–97. EDN: VSFIIT
  8. 8. Nikolaev G. M. (2021). Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osnovy sportivnogo otbora i orientatsii. Shkola budushchego, 1, 224. EDN: XBKXCW
  9. 9. Starodubtsev M. P. (2020). Comparative analysis of the federal state educational standards of higher education 3+ and 3 ++ for the direction of preparation “Physical education” (baccalaureate and magistracy). Fizicheskaya kul'tura, sport – nauka i praktika, 1, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.53742/1999-6799_2020_01_104. EDN: KLCKEW
  10. 10. Umnov V. P. (2019). A study of students’ educational activity motivation at the faculty of physical culture and sport of the Petrozavodsk state university. Psychology in Education, 1(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2019-1-4-351-363. EDN: QULQFN
  11. 11. Khubbiev Sh. Z., Lukina S. M., Khismatullin S. A., & Trunin V. V. (2017). Physical education bachelor course at spsu: design concept. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 10, 5–7. EDN: ZIWMLV
  12. 12. Shchennikova M. Yu., & Kostjuchenko V. F. (2015). Evolution of structure and content of the professional block of educational programs in the field of physical culture and sports. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 8(126), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.5930/issn.1994-4683.2015.08.126.p198-203. EDN: UHXWMP

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.