Obzor kosmicheskogo musora: vozdeistvie na okruzhaiushchuiu sredu, riski i tekhnologicheskie resheniia dlia smiagcheniia i predotvrashcheniia stolknovenii kosmicheskikh apparatov

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-106936
Open Access
All-Russian Scientific Conference «Socio-Economic Processes of Modern Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific Conference «Socio-Economic Processes of Modern Society»
Author:
Adilson Pedro Olivio 1
Work direction:
Социально-экономические процессы в обществе
Pages:
86-96
Received: 22 May 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1495
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
For citation:
Olivio A. (2023). Obzor kosmicheskogo musora: vozdeistvie na okruzhaiushchuiu sredu, riski i tekhnologicheskie resheniia dlia smiagcheniia i predotvrashcheniia stolknovenii kosmicheskikh apparatov. Socio-Economic Processes of Modern Society, 86-96. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-106936

Abstract

В научной статье рассматривается проблема космического мусора и его воздействия на окружающую среду, а также риски и технологические решения для смягчения и предотвращения столкновений космических аппаратов. Растущее количество космического мусора представляет опасность для находящихся на орбите космических аппаратов и инфраструктуры Земли, а также оказывает значительное воздействие на окружающую среду. Решение этой проблемы требует технологических решений, таких как тепловые экраны, лазеры и методы удаления космического мусора на орбите, а также международного сотрудничества между космической отраслью, правительствами и научным сообществом. Это поможет обеспечить безопасность космических аппаратов на орбите и защиту окружающей среды.

References

  1. 1. European space agency, ESA, a. Space debris by the numbers. Novembro de 2020, online [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/Space_debris_by_the_numbers
  2. 2. European space agency, ESA, b. What is the Space Economy? 2019 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://space-economy.esa.int/article/33/what-is-the-spaceeconomy#_ftn1
  3. 3. Weeden B. Policy and Priorities for Tackling Super Wicked Problems and Avoiding the Tragedy of the Commons (In Space). 2014 CODER Workshop Nov 18–20, College Park, USA [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://swfound.org/news/allnews/2014/11/brian-weeden-moderates-policy-panel-and-delivers-policy-keynote-atinaugural-coder-space-debris-workshop/
  4. 4. Masson-zwaan T., Hofmann M. Introduction to Space Law. Kluwer Law International. 4 ed. 2019.
  5. 5. Bressack L. Addressing the problem of orbital pollution: defining a standard of care to hold polluters accountable. In: Washington International Law Review. Vol. 43. 2011.
  6. 6. Medvedeva A. Space Debris Remediation: an International Relations Approach. A Master’s Thesis submitted for the degree of «Master of Science». In: MSc Program Environmental Technology & International Affairs, 2015 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://repositum.tuwien.at/handle/20.500.12708/2159
  7. 7. Flury, W., Contant J.M. The updated IAA position paper in orbital debris. In: Sawaya-Lacoste H. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Space Debris, 1st edition. ESA Publications Division, Darmstadt, 2001.
  8. 8. Tronchetti F. Fundamentals of Space Law and Policy. New York: Springer, 2013.
  9. 9. Salter A.W. Space Debris A Law and Economics Analysis of the Orbital Commons. In: Stanford Technology Law Review (STLR). Stanford, California: Stanford University, vol. 19, issue 2, 2016 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://law.stanford.edu/publications/space-debris-a-law-and-economics-analysis-ofthe-orbital-commons/
  10. 10. Grosse C. Space debris and space traffic management: two contemporary issues of sustainable space security. Seminar aus Völkerrecht. Wien, Mai, 2013 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://eur-int-complaw.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_deicl/VR/VR_Personal/Marboe/Internetpubli kationen/Grosse_2013_Space_debris.pdf
  11. 11. Earl A Space Debris: What is it and Why Should We Care? In: Project Asteria 2019 Sapce Debris Traffic Management & Space Sustainability. Michael Spencer (Ed.). 2019. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://airpower.airforce.gov.au/Publications/Project-Asteria-2019-Space-Debris-Space-Traffic-M
  12. 12. Lyall F., Larsen P. B. Space Law A Treatise. Surray: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2009.
  13. 13. Akers A. To Infinity and beyond: Orbital Space Debris and How to Clean It Up. In: University of La Verne Law Review, 33, rev. 285, 2012 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jjuvl33&div=16&id=&page=
  14. 14. Undseth M., Jolly, Olivari M. Space sustainability: The economics of space debris in perspective, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 87, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2020 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://doi.org/10.1787/a339de43-en
  15. 15. Crowther R. Orbital debris: a growing threat to space operations. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1802), 157–168, 2002 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1118
  16. 16. Kelso T.S. Analysis of the Iridium 33-Cosmos 2251 Collision, presented at the 10th Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, Maui, HI, 2009 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://celestrak.com/publications/AAS/09–368/
  17. 17. Liou J.C., Johnson N.L. Planetary science. Risks in space from orbiting debris. In: Science. 2006 Jan, Vol 311, Issue 5759. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/library/sciencemag-risks-in-space-from-orbiting.pdf
  18. 18. Spark J. ISS Dodges Chinese ASAT Debris. In: Space Safety Magazine [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: www.spacesafetymagazine.com/news/iss-forced-dodge-chineseasatdebris/

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.