Values and life-meaning orientations of troubled teenagers

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-108195
Open Access
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Author:
Liudmila V. Kosikova 1
Work direction:
Developing of System of Positive Interpersonal Relationship, Propitious Psychological Atmosphere and Organizational Culture in Educational Environment
Pages:
202-204
Received: 15 October 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
906
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Southern Federal University
For citation:
Kosikova L. V. (2023). Values and life-meaning orientations of troubled teenagers. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects, 202-204. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-108195

Abstract

The article discusses some aspects of the study of the semantic sphere of teenagers who are registered in the school and the juvenile affairs unit. The results of the comparative analysis showed that the troubled teenagers are more appreciated the values of career/power, having their own children and respect from others, whereas teens who are not registered in the juvenile affairs value the education.

References

  1. 1. Пряжников Н.С. Самоопределение и профессиональная ориентация учащихся / Н.С. Пряжников, Л.С. Румянцева. – М.: Академия, 2013. – 208 с. – EDN WIZYOB
  2. 2. Шульга Т.И. Смысл жизни и ценности детей группы риска / Т.И. Шульга // Социология образования. – 2005. – №11. – С. 26. EDN HTJKDV
  3. 3. Шульга Т.И. Психолого-педагогическое сопровождение детей группы риска: учебное пособие для вузов / Т.И. Шульга. – 2-е изд. – М.: Юрайт, 2023. – 208 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.