En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Monograph
  3. Development of the Russian socio-economic system:...
  4. Nationalism and Populism: identity and differences

Nationalism and Populism: identity and differences

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-110978
Open Access
Monograph «Development of the Russian socio-economic system: challenges and prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Development of the Russian socio-economic system: challenges and prospects»
Author:
Aleksandr I. Kugai 1
Work direction:
Глава 14
Pages:
179-187
Received: 7 April 2024

Rating:
Article accesses:
725
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Severo-Zapadnyi institut upravleniia FGBOU VO "Rossiiskaia akademiia narodnogo khoziaistva i gosudarstvennoi sluzhby pri Prezidente RF"
For citation:
Kekhian L. V., Samokhin A. A., Sergeeva N. V., Chistiakova O. A., Kurbanov D. A., Arutiunian M. S., Khismatullin O. I., Morozova G. M., Kruglov V. N., Tiutin D. V., Manannikova I. V., Krutalevich M. G., Aralbaeva G. G., Kharkova O. M., Chistiakova O. A., Zhdanova E. V., Sudakov D. V., Sudakov O. V., Gordeeva O. I., Denisova O. A., Lekhanova O. L., Gudina T. V., Glukhova O. A., Bukin D. A., Minakov A. V., Ivanova L. N., Korol N. V., Ianchuk I. A., & Kugai A. I. (2024). Development of the Russian socio-economic system: challenges and prospects, 188. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/a-10606

Abstract

The article discloses the logic of populism and nationalism, presents the rationale: when and why these discourses historically arise, and what function they perform in modern politics. First of all, nationalism and populism are internally intertwined, have a common structural origin, they cannot be completely separated from each other, even if it is possible to distinguish the ideal–typical logic of these phenomena. Secondly, nationalism and populism manifest themselves in various forms: the vitality of "banal" nationalism is accompanied by the almost ubiquitous presence of "subtle" populism. Thirdly, the problem of the relationship of nationalism and populism to modern democracy is, in principle, intractable. Nationalism and populism are absolutely necessary for the functioning of modern democracy, as they offer a solution to the border problem and the problem of political representation. Accordingly, without a minimum layer of nationalism and populism, the modern democratic community would disintegrate before it could form.

References

  1. 1. Кугай А.И. Проблема нациестроительства в свете концепции М.В. Ломоносова / А.И. Кугай // Управленческое консультирование. – 2012. – №2 (46). – С. 32–38. EDN OZQIER
  2. 2. Кугай А.И. Самая высокая цена – на ярмарке тщеславия: психоаналитическая концепция нарциссизма Эриха Фромма / А.И. Кугай // Современные вызовы образования и психология формирования личности: монография / Т.Е. Демидова, Г.А. Волковицкая, К.В. Кулемина [и др.]. – Чебоксары: Среда, 2023. – С. 166–174.
  3. 3. Кугай А.И. Групповая психология и психоанализ лидерства / А.И. Кугай // Педагогика и психология как науки формирования потенциала современного общества: монография / А.А. Киселев, Л.П. Самойлов, С.Л. Данильченко [и др.]. – Чебоксары: Среда, 2023. – С. 107–115.
  4. 4. Andrew Rehfeld. Towards a General Theory of Political Representation. The Journal of Politics. 2006. Vol. 68. pp. 1–21.
  5. 5. Andreas Wimmer (Eds). Nation and National Identity: The European Perspective. Chur: Rüegger, 1999. pp. 55–72.
  6. 6. Ben Stanley. The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2008. Vol. 13. pp. 95–110.
  7. 7. Benjamin Arditi. Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics in Francisco Panizza (Ed.). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London and New York: Verso, 2005. pp. 72–98,
  8. 8. Bernard Yack. Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism. Political Theory. 2001. Vol. 29. pp. 517–536.
  9. 9. Cas Mudde, The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition. 2004. Vol. 39. pp. 542–563.
  10. 10. Charles Taylor. Nationalism and Modernity in Ronald Biener (Ed.). Theorizing Nationalism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999. pp. 219–246.
  11. 11. Claude Lefort. The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity. 1986. pp. 273–291.
  12. 12. De Cleen, B., Moffitt, B., Panayotu, P., & Stavrakakis, I. The Potentials and Difficulties of Transnational Populism: The Case of the Democracy in Europe. Political Studies. 2020. Vol. 68 (1). pp.146–166.
  13. 13. Ernest Gellner. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.
  14. 14. Jan Jagers and Stefaan Walgrave. Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical. Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium’. European Journal of Political Research. 2007. Vol. 46. pp. 319–345.
  15. 15. Jan-Werner Müller. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
  16. 16. John Breuilly. Nationalism and the State. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993.
  17. 17. John Brahey. Nationalism and the state. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982.
  18. 18. Laclau E. On populist reason. – L. – N.Y.: Verso, 2005.
  19. 19. Maureen A. Eger and Sarah Valdez. Neo-Nationalism in Western Europe. European. Sociological Review. 2015. Vol. 31. pp. 115–130.
  20. 20. Margaret Canovan. Populism for Political Theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies. 2004. Vol. 9. pp. 241–252,
  21. 21. Michael Billig. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage, 1995.
  22. 22. Michael Mann. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  23. 23. Peter Wade. Race, Nature and Culture. London: Pluto Press, 2002.
  24. 24. Quoted in Walker Connor. A Nation Is a Nation, Is a State, Is an Ethnic Group. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1978. Vol. 1. pp. 377–400.
  25. 25. Rogers Brubaker. Why Populism? Theory and Society. 2017. Vol. 46. pp. 357–385.
  26. 26. Simon Tormey. Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. By Takis S. Pappas. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. pp. 57–58
  27. 27. Yannis Stavrakakis and Giorgos Katsambekis. Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA’. Journal of Political Ideologies. 2014. Vol. 19. pp. 119–142.
  28. 28. Jan Jagers and Stefaan Walgrave. Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium’. European Journal of Political Research. 2007. Vol. 46. pp. 319–345.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.