En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. Vol 8, No 2
  4. Effective methods of teaching regional studies

Effective methods of teaching regional studies

Research Article
EDN: NJPVAI DOI: 10.31483/r-116160
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 8
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 8
Authors:
Victoria R. Sagitova 1 , Elvira R. Galiullina 1 , Louise K. Karimova 1
Work direction:
Pedagogy and Modern Education
Pages:
75-80
Received: 24 January 2025 / Accepted: 30 April 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
811
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Kazan Federal University
For citation:
Sagitova V. R., Galiullina E. R., & Karimova L. K. (2025). Effective methods of teaching regional studies. Development of education, 8(2), 75-80. EDN: NJPVAI. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-116160
UDC 316.334.52

Abstract

This article provides a detailed analysis of the methods of project and problem-oriented learning. The methods presented by the authors of the article are considered to be the most effective in the process of training students of regional studies in accordance with the requirements of the competence approach of the federal state educational standards. The authors conducted an analytical review of theoretical ideas about regional studies. The article reveals the opposite points of view of domestic scientists on its understanding – these are the studies of V.V. Makarenko and V.A. Gorbanyov. The article presents the teaching methods that are the most effective for the formation of the necessary competencies in students within the framework of the realization of the requirements of the federal state educational standards. Such methods included: "Challenge Based Learning", "Pebble in the Pond", 4C/ID (4 components – 4 components and instructional design – pedagogical design), business game. The result of the study was the conclusion that the basis of regional studies is best reflected in the interdisciplinary approach, which combines both classical methods of training bachelors and masters and modern methods.

References

  1. 1. Bukharina, T. (2011). Introduction of innovation technologies into the pedagogical process of a medical higher edicational establishment. The Doctor, 10, 71-72. EDN: OCSODX
  2. 2. Gorbanyov, V. A. (2023). Regional studies, regionalistics, country studies, and regional geography. International research journal, 1(127). EDN: QMGXWD. https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2023.127.137
  3. 3. Degterev, V. A., Tribunskaya, V. A. (2014). Competence approach – a new paradigm of education. Bulletin of social and humanitarian education and science, 4, 35-47. EDN: UIWGDZ
  4. 4. Konoplya, A. (2010). Competence-based model of training medical students. Higher education in Russia, 1, 98-101. EDN: KZBHOH
  5. 5. Kremnyov, E. V., Lesnikovskaya, E. V. (2019). On the question of the goals and objectives of transdisciplinary regionology. Ojkumena. Regional researches, 3, 65–75. EDN: VRVJCI. https://doi.org/110.24866/1998-6785/2019-3/65-75
  6. 6. Lekerova, G. J. (2009). Active teaching methods as a psychological basis for the development of motivation in the learning process. Psychology of education, 6, 17-28. EDN: KUYVXL
  7. 7. Lerner, I. Ya. (1974). Problem-based learning., 64. Moscow : Znanie.
  8. 8. Makarenko, V. V. (2019). On the object-subject field of regional studies and its place among other sciences. Comparative politics Russia, 10(4), 12-33. EDN: TDRPBI. https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2019-10039
  9. 9. (2020). Global integrated regional studies as a research approach and scientific school. Interview with Alexey Dmitrievich Voskresensky, Professor at MGIMO, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations, 20(2), 356-366. EDN: FOQGRS. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-356-366
  10. 10. Pershina, I. B., Kabakanova, Y. O. (2023). Modern effective methods teaching at university. Science bulletin, 1(9(66)), 15-21. EDN WNAYSP
  11. 11. Gallagher, S. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 332-362.
  12. 12. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27-61. EDN: JTSWIN. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027
  13. 13. Graaff, E., Kolmos, А. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. Int. J. Engng Ed.,19(5), 657-662.
  14. 14. Shelton, J. B., Smith, R. F. (1998). Problem-based learning in analytical science undergraduate teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 16(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514980160102

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.