Improvement of the strategy and tools for intercultural adaptation of foreign students

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-127078
Open Access
Monograph «Psychological and pedagogical issues of modern education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Psychological and pedagogical issues of modern education»
Authors:
Natalia L. Smit 1 , Sergei V. Ilkevich 1
Work direction:
Глава 6
Pages:
95-111
Received: 10 March 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
446
Published in:
РИНЦ Информрегистр
1 FSFEI HE "Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation"
For citation:

Abstract

The development of educational export is an important strategic task both for Russian universities at the institutional level, allowing them to increase the level of global competitiveness, and at the state level, ensuring the implementation of the principles of the «soft power» strategy. Both of these goal-settings contribute to the achievement of national interests through attraction and persuasion. To increase the efficiency of the export of Russian education and high-quality training of specialists for the global labor market, it is necessary to develop effective methods, mechanisms and technologies for improving the intercultural adaptive environment of educational organizations, which became the main goal of this study. Cultural diversity is a key value guide for the classification of cultures of peoples and countries, as well as an important criterion for the effective management of multicultural groups and organizations. In the context of educational organizations, cultural diversity is becoming a powerful driver for the development of competencies in the host institutions for foreign students, but it is important to systematically approach all components of an intercultural adaptive environment based on the implementation and scaling of best practices. In this study, based on a sociological survey of foreign students in Russian universities, priority adaptation tools are systematized both along the internal contour of the educational organization, as well as and in external bilateral and network interactions. The research recommendations are both strategic in nature, defining the fundamental tasks of educational organizations to create an intercultural adaptive environment, and of an applied and methodological nature, based on proposals regarding the development of specific tools for intercultural adaptation.

References

  1. 1. Илькевич С.В. Модель межкультурной адапатационной экосистемы университетов как элемент стратегического развития / С.В. Илькевич, Л.В. Приходько, Н.Л. Смит // Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент. – 2020. – Т. 11. – №3. – С. 324–334. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2020-3-324-334. EDN ZHTGKF
  2. 2. Илькевич С.В. Сервисная модель тьюторской поддержки иностранных студентов / С.В. Илькевич, Н.Л. Смит // Сервис в России и за рубежом. – 2020. – Т. 14. – №5 (92). – С. 142–152. https://doi.org/10.24411/1995-042X-2020-10513. EDN JXZNGT
  3. 3. Смит Н.Л. Кластерный подход к адаптации в многомерных средах университетов / Н.Л. Смит, А.В. Антонов // Сервис plus. – 2020. – Т. 14. – №4. – С. 87–96. https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-693X-2020-10410. EDN QACBFC
  4. 4. Смит Н.Л. Стратегические инструменты перехода к межкультурному взаимодействию и управлению многообразием в образовательной организации / Н.Л. Смит, С.В. Илькевич // Сервис в России и за рубежом. – 2020. – Т. 14. – №2 (89). – С. 166–179. https://doi.org/10.24411/1995–042X-2020–10215. EDN BJQPZY
  5. 5. Adair W.L., Hideg I., Spence J.R. The culturally intelligence team: the impact of team cultural intelligence on cultural heterogeneity on team shared values // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2013. Vol. 44. Pp. 941–962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113492894
  6. 6. Arvanitakis J., Hornsby D.J. Are Universities Redundant? In: J. Arvanitakis and D.J. Hornsby (eds.) Universities, the Citizen Scholar & the Future of Higher Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. Pp. 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538697_2
  7. 7. Ayoko O.B., Zhang Y., Nicoli J. Conflict and socio-cultural adaptation: the mediating and moderating role of conflict communication behaviors and cultural intelligence // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2021. – Vol. 33. №17. Pp. 3451–3491. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1910535. EDN CUJMPR
  8. 8. Blasko M. Making the tacit explicit: rethinking culturally inclusive pedagogy in international student academic adaptation // Pedagogy, Culture & Society. – 2015. – Vol. 23. – №1. – Pp. 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.922120
  9. 9. Braslauskas J. Effective creative intercultural communication in the context of business interaction: theoretical and practical aspects // Creativity studies. 2020. Vol. 13. №1. Pp. 119–215. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.12094. EDN FSTHRY
  10. 10. Delpechitre D., Baker D.S. Cross-Cultural Selling: Examining the Importance of Cultural Intelligence in Sales Education // Journal of Marketing Education. – 2017. Vol. 39. №2. Pp. 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475317710060
  11. 11. Erez M., Gati E. A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: from the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture // Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2004. Vol. 53. №4. Pp. 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464–0597.2004.00190.x
  12. 12. Han S., Pistole M.C., Caldwell J.M. Acculturative Stress, Parental and Professor Attachment, and College Adjustment in Asian International Students // Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 2017. Vol. 45. №2. Pp. 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12068
  13. 13. Harrison D.A., Klein K.J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations // The Academy of Management Review Archive. 2007. Vol. 32. №4. Pp. 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
  14. 14. Heyward M. From international to intercultural – Redefining the international school for a globalized world // Journal of research in International Education. 2002. Vol. 1. №1. Pp. 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/147524090211002
  15. 15. Klein K., Knight A., Ziegert J. Lim B. C., Saltz J. When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2011. Vol. 114. Pp. 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.004
  16. 16. Lochtie D. A «special relationship’ in higher education? What influence might the US higher education sector have in terms of support for international students in the UK? // Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 20. №2–3. Pp. 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2015.1074627
  17. 17. MacNab B., Worthley R. Individual characteristics as predictors of cultural intelligence development: The relevance of self-efficacy // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2011. Vol. 36. №1. Pp.62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.12.001
  18. 18. Marginson S. The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems // Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 72. №4. Pp. 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x. EDN DSMORV
  19. 19. Marr L., Aynsley-Smith S. Putting Students First: Developing Accessible and Integrated Student Support. In: L. Thomas and P. Hixenbaugh (eds.) Personal Tutoring in Higher Education. 2016. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books. Pp. 73–82.
  20. 20. McDonald I. Supporting international students in UK higher education institutions // Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2014. Vol. 18. №2. Pp. 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2014.909900
  21. 21. Moon R.J. Internationalisation without cultural diversity? // Higher education in Korea // Comparative Education. 2016. Vol. 52. №1. Pp. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2015.1125679
  22. 22. Ott D.L., Michailova S. Cultural Intelligence: A Review and New Research Avenues // International Journal of Management Reviews. 2018. Vol. 20. Pp. 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12118
  23. 23. Pherali T., Lewis A. Developing global partnerships in higher education for peacebuilding: a strategy for pathways to impact // Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 78. Pp. 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00367-7. EDN HXPLOQ
  24. 24. Rajaram K. Cultural Intelligence in Teaching and Learning. In: Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies. 2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9201-8_2
  25. 25. Ramsey J.R., Lorenz M.P. Exploring the Impact of Cross-Cultural Management Education on Cultural Intelligence, Student Satisfaction, and Commitment // Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2015. Vol. 15. №1. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0124
  26. 26. Rehg M.T., Gundlach M.J., Grigorian R.A. Examining the influence of cross-cultural training on cultural intelligence and specific self-efficacy // Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal. 2012. Vol. 19. Pp. 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211219892
  27. 27. Ronen S., Shenkar O. Clustering countries in attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis // Academy of management review. 1985. Vol. 10. №3. Pp. 435–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4278955
  28. 28. Sercu L. Internationalization at home as a factor affecting intercultural competence. A study among Belgian university students // European Journal of Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 13. №4. Pp. 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2094815. EDN GWVSKD
  29. 29. Song Y., Xia J. Scale making in intercultural communication: experiences of international students in Chinese universities // Language, Culture and Curriculum. – 2020. Vol. 34. №4. Pp. 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1857392. EDN MHOWKI
  30. 30. Stork A., Walker B. Becoming an Outstanding Personal Tutor: Supporting Learners Through Personal Tutoring and Coaching. Northwich: Critical Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781041054351
  31. 31. Straker J. International Student Participation in Higher Education: Changing the Focus From «International Students» to «Participation» // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2016. Vol. 20. №4. Pp. 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315316628992
  32. 32. Thomas L. Widening participation and the increased need for personal tutoring. In L. Thomas & P. Hixenbaugh, eds. Personal tutoring in higher education. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books, 2006. Pp. 21–31.
  33. 33. Wilczewski M., Alon I. Language and communication in international students’ adaptation: a bibliometric and content analysis review // High Education. 2023. Vol. 85. Pp. 1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00888-8. EDN BQCDYJ
  34. 34. Wu H.-P., Garza E., Guzman N. International Students’ Challenge and Adjustment to College // Educational Research International. 2015. Vol. 2015. Article 202753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/202753
  35. 35. Zhang Y. Expatriate development for cross-cultural adjustment: effects of cultural distance and cultural intelligence // Human Resource Development Review. 2013. Vol. 12. Pp. 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484312461637

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.