En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Coaching psychology: methodology, theory, practice
  4. Iskusstvennyi intellekt v kouchinge: sistematiches...

Iskusstvennyi intellekt v kouchinge: sistematicheskii analiz effektivnosti, eticheskikh dilemm i strategii gibridnoi integratsii

Proceeding
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference «Coaching psychology: methodology, theory, practice»
Authors:
Aliona V. Shakhova 1 , Fiodor S. Taranenko 2
Work direction:
Varia (we accept materials in other areas that correspond to the topic of the conference)
Pages:
159-166
Received: 1 April 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
189
Published in:
Информрегистр РИНЦ
1 National Research University Higher School of Economics
2 net
For citation:
Shakhova A. V., & Taranenko F. S. (2025). Iskusstvennyi intellekt v kouchinge: sistematicheskii analiz effektivnosti, eticheskikh dilemm i strategii gibridnoi integratsii. Coaching psychology: methodology, theory, practice, 159-166. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

Целью данного систематического обзора является синтез современных академических исследований (2020–2025 гг.), посвященных интеграции искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) в коучинг. Методология включает критический анализ 17 работ, охватывающих эмпирические исследования, концептуальные модели и практические кейсы в контекстах лидерства, медицины, продаж и психического здоровья. Результаты демонстрируют, что ИИ эффективен в структурированных задачах, таких как постановка целей (увеличение уверенности пользователей на 34%, Khandelwal & Upadhyay, 2021) и анализ данных (выявление 63% запросов, связанных с карьерным ростом, Movsumova et al., 2020), но уступает человеку в сферах, требующих эмпатии и работы с неоднозначными сценариями (снижение эффективности на 39% в задачах двойной петли обучения, Arakawa & Yakura). Гибридные модели, сочетающие ИИ и человеческий коучинг, признаны наиболее перспективными, демонстрируя повышение достижения целей на 28% (Arakawa & Yakura); однако их внедрение сопряжено с этическими рисками, включая предвзятость данных (35% гендерных стереотипов в рекомендациях, Terblanche, 2024) и проблемы конфиденциальности (18% пользователей выражают обеспокоенность, Huang et al., 2025). Рекомендации для практиков включают развитие ИИ-грамотности, внедрение прозрачных гибридных систем и проведение лонгитюдных исследований для оценки долгосрочного воздействия.

References

  1. 1. Arakawa R., Yakura H. Coaching Copilot: Blended Form of an LLM-Powered Chatbot and a Human Coach to Effectively Support Self-Reflection for Leadership Growth. ACM Conversational User Interfaces 2024 (CUI ’24).
  2. 2. Axelsson M., Churamani N., Çaldır A., Gunes H. (2025). Participant Perceptions of a Robotic Coach Conducting Positive Psychology Exercises: A Qualitative Analysis. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 14 (2), Article 36.
  3. 3. Blyler A.P., Seligman M.E.P. (2024). AI assistance for coaches and therapists. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 19 (4), 579–591.
  4. 4. Casenave E., Schmitt L. (2025). Comparing AI coaching and sales manager coaching: A construal-level approach. Journal of Business Research, 190, 115241.
  5. 5. De Duro E.S., Improta R., Stella M. (2025). Introducing CounseLLMe: A dataset of simulated mental health dialogues for comparing LLMs like Haiku, LLaMAntino and ChatGPT against humans. Emerging Trends in Drugs, Addictions, and Health, 5, 100170.
  6. 6. Elyoseph Z., Levkovich I., Shinan-Altman S. (2024). Assessing prognosis in depression: comparing perspectives of AI models, mental health professionals and the general public. Family Medicine and Community Health, 12, e002583. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002583. EDN: EXFPMC
  7. 7. Graßmann C., Schermuly C.C. (2021). Coaching With Artificial Intelligence: Concepts and Capabilities. Human Resource Development Review, 20 (1), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320982891. EDN: KKCDEV
  8. 8. Huang Z., Berry M.P., Chwyl C., Hsieh G., Wei J., Forman E.M. (2025). Comparing Large Language Model AI and Human-Generated Coaching Messages for Behavioral Weight Loss. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. Advance online publication.
  9. 9. Kämmer J.E., Hautz W.E., Krummrey G., Sauter T.C., Penders D., Birrenbach T., Bienefeld N. (2024). Effects of interacting with a large language model compared with a human coach on the clinical diagnostic process and outcomes among fourth-year medical students: study protocol for a prospective, randomised experiment using patient vignettes. BMJ Open, 14 (7), e087469. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087469. EDN: UHYVAJ
  10. 10. Kellogg K.C., Lifshitz H., Randazzo S., Mollick E., Dell’Acqua F., McFowland III E., Candelon F., Lakhani K.R. (2025). Novice risk work: How juniors coaching seniors on emerging technologies such as generative AI can lead to learning failures. Information and Organization, 35 (1), 100559.
  11. 11. Khandelwal K., Upadhyay A.K. (2021). The advent of artificial intelligence-based coaching. Strategic HR Review, 20 (4), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/shr-03-2021-0013. EDN: NGRCCX
  12. 12. Luo X., Qin M.S., Fang Z., Qu Z. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Coaches for Sales Agents: Caveats and Solutions. Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920956676. EDN: KNRTOW
  13. 13. Movsumova E., Alexandrov V., Rudenko L., Aizen V., Sidelnikova S., Voytko M. (2020). Consciousness: effect of coaching process and specifics through AI usage. e-mentor, 4 (86), 79–86.
  14. 14. Pavlović J., Krstić J., Mitrović L., Babić Đ., Milosavljević A., Nikolić M., Karaklić T., Mitrović T. Generative AI as a metacognitive agent: A comparative mixed-method study with human participants on ICF-mimicking exam performance.
  15. 15. Soman G., Judy M.V., Abou A.M. (2025). Human guided empathetic AI agent for mental health support leveraging reinforcement learning-enhanced retrieval-augmented generation. Cognitive Systems Research, 90, 101337.
  16. 16. Terblanche N.H.D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Coaching: Redefining People Development and Organizational Performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 60 (4), 631–638.
  17. 17. Terblanche N., Molyn J., de Haan E., Nilsson V.O. (2022). Comparing artificial intelligence and human coaching goal attainment efficacy. PLoS ONE, 17 (6), e0270255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270255. EDN: FTNXCS

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.