Psychological readiness for fatherhood of university students

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-139107
Open Access
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: from theory to practice»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: from theory to practice»
Authors:
Tatiana V. Levkova 1 , Uliana A. Levkova 1
Work direction:
Общая психология, психология личности, история психологии
Pages:
537-540
Received: 2 June 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
91
1 FGBOU VO "Dal'nevostochnyi gosudarstvennyi universitet putei soobshcheniia"
For citation:
Levkova T. V., & Levkova U. A. (2025). Psychological readiness for fatherhood of university students. Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: from theory to practice, 537-540. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-139107

Abstract

The article discusses the basic characteristics of fatherhood, psychological readiness for fatherhood. The experimental study used: the questionnaire "Diagnosis of the level of moral and ethical responsibility of a person" (I.G. Tymoshchuk); the test questionnaire of parental attitude (A.Ya. Varga, V.V. Stolin); the method of T. Leary "Diagnosis of interpersonal relationships". As a result, the importance of students' moral and ethical responsibility in the context of adopting an unborn child was analyzed, as well as the importance of their own interaction with their father in developing their own family interaction strategy.

References

  1. 1. Борисенко Ю.В. Психология отцовства / Ю.В. Борисенко. – М.; Обнинск: ИГСОЦИН, 2007. – 220 с. – EDN TBAJMD
  2. 2. Кон И.С. Мальчик – отец мужчины / И.С. Кон. – М.: Время, 2017. – 235 с.
  3. 3. Кон И.С. Мужчина в меняющемся мире / И.С. Кон. – М.: Время, 2009. – 496 с. EDN QOPGDF
  4. 4. Коркина Н.А. Отцовство в современной семье / Н.А. Коркина // Семейная психология и семейная терапия. – 2003. – №4. – С. 48–54.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.