The role of the tutor in the adaptational period of first-year students

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-21473
Open Access
All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference «Trends in the education development: teacher, educational organization, society – 2018»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference «Trends in the education development: teacher, educational organization, society – 2018»
Authors:
Vera N. Il'icheva 1 , Dmitrij A. Sokolov 1 , Nikolaj N. Pisarev 1 , Arina M. Karandeeva 1 , Mariya I. Soboleva 1 , Kseniya A. Volkova 1
Work direction:
Исследования в образовании и образовательные практики
Pages:
157-159
Received: 14 September 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
3658
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FSBEI of HE “N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
For citation:
Il'icheva V. N., Sokolov D. A., Pisarev N. N., Karandeeva A. M., Soboleva M. I., & Volkova K. A. (2018). The role of the tutor in the adaptational period of first-year students. Trends in the education development: teacher, educational organization, society – 2018, 157-159. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-21473
UDC 616–003.96:378

Abstract

Adaptation of first-year students to educational medium of a university is the main problem of the faculty. According to the authors’ opinion a key role in this period is played by the tutor, which helps the student to become accustomed to the conditions of the psychological and pedagogical process in the educational environment. When forming an individual approach to learning, one should take into account the personal characteristics of each student, stimulate interest based on professional and motivational components, following the achievement of the main goal – mastering the specialty.

References

  1. 1. Alekseeva, N. T., Karandeeva, A. M., Kvaratskheliia, A. G., & Anokhina, Zh. A. (2016). Moral'no-nravstvennoe stanovlenie lichnosti studentov mladshikh kursov meditsinskogo vuza. Bioetika i sovremennye problemy meditsinskoi etiki i deontologii: Mater. respublikanskoi nauchno-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem, 221-224. Vitebskii gosudarstvennyi meditsinskii universitet.
  2. 2. Alekseeva, N. T., Klochkova, S. V., Nikitiuk, D. B., & Kvaratskheliia, A. G. (2017). Kompetentnostnyi podkhod pri prepodavanii anatomii cheloveka. Meditsinskoe obrazovanie XXI veka: kompetentnostnyi podkhod i ego realizatsiia v sisteme nepreryvnogo meditsinskogo i farmatsevticheskogo obrazovaniia: Sb. mater. respublikanskoi nauchno-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem, S. 5, 5-7. Vitebskii gosudarstvennyi meditsinskii universitet.
  3. 3. Belov, E. V. (2015). Meditsinskaia pedagogika i eio rol' v professional'noi deiatel'nosti vracha (prepodavatelia meditsinskogo vuza). Pedagogicheskoe masterstvo i pedagogicheskie tekhnologii, 3 (5), 67-69.
  4. 4. Il'icheva, V. N., Sokolov, D. A., Nasonova, N. A., & Pisarev, N. N. (2017). Zdorov'esberezhenie v studencheskoi srede vysshei meditsinskoi shkoly. Innovatsionnye obuchaiushchie tekhnologii v meditsine: Sb. mater. respublikanskoi nauchno-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem, 183-185.
  5. 5. Il'icheva, V. N., Minasian, V. V., Pisarev, N. N., & Maslov, N. V. (2017). Formirovanie professional'nykh kompetentsii u studentov mediko-profilakticheskogo fakul'teta. Meditsinskoe obrazovanie XXI veka: kompetentnostnyi podkhod i ego realizatsiia v sisteme nepreryvnogo meditsinskogo i farmatsevticheskogo obrazovaniia: Sb. mater. respublikanskoi nauchno-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem, 383-385. Vitebskii gosudarstvennyi meditsinskii universitet.
  6. 6. Kvaratskheliia, A. G., Nikitiuk, D. B., Klochkova, S. V., & Alekseeva, N. T. (2016). Formirovanie motivatsii professional'noi deiatel'nosti i kompetentnostnyi podkhod pri rabote so studentami meditsinskogo vuza. Krymskii zhurnal eksperimental'noi i klinicheskoi meditsiny, T. 6, 3, 237-239.
  7. 7. Lopatina, L. A., Kvaratskheliia, A. G., & Nasonova, N. A. (2018). Intelligentnost' pedagoga v sovremennykh realiiakh obrazovaniia. Mater. mezhregional'noi zaochnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi Internet-konf., posviashch. 90-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia pervogo zav. kafedroi anatomii s kursom operativnoi khirurgii i topograficheskoi anatomii d-ra med. nauk, profes. Aleksandra Vasil'evicha Kraeva: Sb. nauchn. statei, 44-48. Kirov.
  8. 8. Nasonova, N. A., Kvaratskheliia, A. G., Lopatina, L. A., Sokolov, D. A., Il'icheva, V. N., & Pisarev, N. N. (2017). Rol' vospitatel'noi raboty v meditsinskom vuze v formirovanii nravstvennogo oblika vracha. Innovatsionnye obuchaiushchie tekhnologii v meditsine: Sb. mater. respublikanskoi nauchno-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem., 356-357.
  9. 9. Nasonova, N. A., Sokolov, D. A., Kvaratskheliia, A. G., Lopatina, L. A., Il'icheva, V. N., & Shevchenko, A. A. (2016). T'iutorstvo kak neotemlemaia chast' instituta kuratorstva v vysshei meditsinskoi shkole. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiia, T. 5, 3(16), 93-95.
  10. 10. Nasonova, N. A., Minasian, V. V., Zavarzin, A. A., Pisarev, N. N., & Gundarova, O. P. (2018). Rol' prepodavatelia v formirovanii motivatsii k obucheniiu studentov meditsinskikh vuzov. Mater. mezhregional'noi zaochn. nauchno-prakticheskoi Internet-konferentsii, posviashch. 90-letiiu so dnia rozhd. pervogo zav. kaf. anatomii s kursom operativnoi khirurgii i topograficheskoi anatomii d-ra med. nauk, prof. A. V. Kraeva: Sb. nauchn. statei, 63-66. Kirov.
  11. 11. Nasonova, N. A., Pisarev, N. N., & Bobrovskikh, A. M. (2017). Rol' obshchekul'turnykh kompetentsii v formirovanii lichnosti vypusknikov meditsinskikh vuzov. Meditsinskoe obrazovanie XXI veka: kompetentnostnyi podkhod i ego realizatsiia v sisteme nepreryvnogo meditsinskogo i farmatsevticheskogo obrazovaniia, 581-583.
  12. 12. Il'icheva, V. N. (2016). Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskii klimat kollektiva kafedry kak faktor effektivnosti ee deiatel'nosti. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiia, T. 5, 2(15), 222-225.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.