En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Education, innovation, research as a resource for...
  4. The role of pedagogical practice in the formation...

The role of pedagogical practice in the formation of professional competence of the specialist

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-21763
Open Access
II Сollection of articles «Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
II Сollection of articles «Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development»
Author:
Margarita Y. Briskina 1
Work direction:
Исследования в образовании и образовательные практики как инструмент принятия решений
Pages:
150-154
Received: 8 November 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
3714
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Nizhny Tagil State Social Pedagogical Institute (branch) FSAEI of HE “Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University”
For citation:
Briskina M. Y. (2018). The role of pedagogical practice in the formation of professional competence of the specialist. Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development, 150-154. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-21763
UDC 37

Abstract

Present article is devoted to the problem of pedagogical practice organisation, which is the essential part of professional preparation of the bachelor of philological education. The problem of pedagogical practice is investigated in the aspect of competence approach. The article determines its aims, content and the main principles of organization. The author clearly highlighted the competencies that are formed thanks to the pedagogical practice, and defined the criteria for assessing the activities of students, which determine the level of competence formation.

References

  1. 1. (2004). Kompetentnostnyi podkhod v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii: Kollektivnaia monografiia. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.