En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. No 2 (2)
  4. Templates and algorithms in the mathematical engin...

Templates and algorithms in the mathematical engineering training

Research Article
EDN: YPOWFN DOI: 10.31483/r-21827
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Authors:
Viktoriia G. Kazakevich 1 , Elena A. Tolkacheva 1
Work direction:
Theoretical and applied research in education
Pages:
13-19
Received: 18 November 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
5231
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI"
For citation:
UDC 378.147

Abstract

The work considers the types of thinking and levels of their formation, based on a two-factor classification of educational tasks. Examples of pattern tasks and algorithm tasks are given. It was hypothesized that a transition to the next level of education implies a step in the predominance of the type of thinking (in the proposed typology). The main methods of testing the hypothesis will be the development of systems of tasks-markers to identify the type of thinking and the level of its formation; a comparative analysis of types of thinking formation and the success of training, its effectiveness; classification of educational mathematical problems for the formation of the program of the future engineer.

References

  1. 1. Kazakevich, V.G., Tolkacheva, E.A. (2016) The role of analytical and synthetic methods of knowledge in education. Modern education: content, technology, quality, 2, 240–242. SPb.
  2. 2. Shorokhov, E.V. (1966) The main directions of research in the psychology of thinking in capitalist countries. M.
  3. 3. John, Е.R. (1957) Contributions to the study of the problem-solving process. Psychological Monographs. – Vol. 71. – №18. – WN 447.
  4. 4. Vygotsky, L.S. (1999) Thinking and speaking. M.
  5. 5. Kazakevich, V.G., Tolkacheva, E.A. (2017) Classification of tasks based on the methods of knowledge. Tasks in teaching mathematics, physics, computer science: theory, experience, innovation, 151–155. Vologda.
  6. 6. Pozdnyakov, S.N. Training tasks for the exam in discrete mathematics. URL: http://pozdnkov.vm2-leti.spb.ru/ucebnye-gruppy-1/ekzameny/podgotovka-k-dm-2010-1
  7. 7. Pozdnyakov, S.N. (2016) Training DM-2016. URL: http://pozdnkov.vm2-leti.spb.ru/ucebnye-gruppy-1/ekzameny/podgotovka-dm-2016
  8. 8. Tikhomirov, O. K. (1984) Psychology of thinking, 272. M.
  9. 9. Datsun, N.N., Urazaeva, L.Ju. (2017) Motivation of student in IT-disciplines. Modern information technology and IT education, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 4, p. 9–22, dec. 2017. ISSN 2411-1473.
  10. 10. Polya, G. (1954) Mathematics and plausible reasoning, 464. M., 1975.
  11. 11. Sitaraman, M., Hallstrom, J.O., White, J., Drachova-Strang, S., Harton, H.K., Leonard, D., Krone, J., Pak, R. (2009) Engaging students in specification and reasoning: "Hands-on" experimentation and evaluation. Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 50–54. Buenos Aires.
  12. 12. Burkov, E.A., Paderno, P.I., Sopina, O.P. (2018) Analysis and combination of activity algorithms evaluation methods. Human Factors in Complex Technical Systems and Environments (ERGO)s and Environments, ERGO, 111–114. SPb.
  13. 13. Kolmogorov, A.N. (1962) Life and thinking in terms of cybernetics. Theses of the report at the joint theoretical conference of philosophical seminars on philosophical questions of cybernetics. M.
  14. 14. Pozdnyakov, S.N. (2015) Tempus Project Meta-Math (Modern Educational Technologies for Math Curricula in Engineering Education of Russia), 106. SPb.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.