En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. No 1 (3)
  4. The problem of university crisis in modern postind...

The problem of university crisis in modern postindustrial society

Research Article
EDN: VHWLCF DOI: 10.31483/r-22220
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Authors:
Evgeniya S. Timofeeva 1 , Oleg Y. Efremov 1
Work direction:
Russian education system
Pages:
54-57
Received: 17 February 2019

Rating:
Article accesses:
5366
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State University
For citation:
Timofeeva E. S., & Efremov O. Y. (2019). The problem of university crisis in modern postindustrial society. Development of education, 54-57. EDN: VHWLCF. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-22220
UDC 378

Abstract

The article highlights the main problems of modern post-industrial University education as an element of society and culture. Modern definitions of the University concepts are given, its increasing role in the formation of human capital in a society of high production and consumption is defined. The most dominant problems and ways to solve them are identified, namely: the topical issues of the learning process, the problems of the quality of education and commercialization of universities, the problems of unity and inseparability of education and culture.

Funding Agency

Grant Number
Russian Foundation for Basic Research 18-410-210005 р_а
Cabinet of Ministers of the Chuvash Republic
Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и Кабинета Министров Чувашской Республики в рамках научного проекта №18–410–210005 «р_а»

References

  1. 1. Mukin, V. A. Lichnost' v universitetskom prostranstve Person in the university space. Filosofiia. Tolerantnost'. Globalizatsiia. Vostok i Zapad., , 115. Ufa.
  2. 2. Zolkin, A. L. (2018). Missiia universiteta v sovremennoi kul'ture. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 302-400.
  3. 3. Mukin, V. A. Kontseptual'nye osnovaniia filosofii obrazovaniia. Filosofiia obrazovaniia: kontseptual'nye podkhody, 103-104.
  4. 4. Mukin, V. A., & Efremov, O. Iu. (2018). Kontseptsiia i optimizatsii regional'nogo universiteta. Sovremennoe obrazovanie, 11-21.
  5. 5. Stepanov, A. G., & Mukin, V. A. (2016). Etnokul'turnoe vzaimodeistvie v sotsial'nom prostranstve regiona. Kontekst i refleksiia, 6A, 5, 259-268.
  6. 6. Mukin, V. A. (2011). Prostranstvo razvitiia lichnosti v deiatel'nosti universitetov. Universitety i obshchestvo. Sotrudnichestvo i razvitie universitetov v XXI veke, Izd, 691. Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta.
  7. 7. Mukin, V. A. (2017). Zhiznennye tsennosti, formiruemye v universitetskom prostranstve. Filosofiia i sotsiologiia. Vestnik vysshei shkoly, 40.
  8. 8. Naumova, O. S. (2017). Universitet kak sotsiokul'turnyi institut: k postanovke problemy. Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniia, 85.
  9. 9. Mukin, V. A. (2018). Kontseptsiia realizatsii komplektnosti v universitetskom prostranstve Chuvashskoi Respubliki. Sotsiodinamika.
  10. 10. Osipova, A. M., & Osipov, A. M. (2018). Sotsiologiia obrazovaniia., 367. M.: Iurait.
  11. 11. Babintseva, E. I. (2014). Snizhenie kachestva obrazovaniia kak sledstvie biurokratizatsii vuzov. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Pravo, 16 (187).
  12. 12. Mukin, V. A., & Sokolova, L. Iu. (2017). Tsennostnye orientatsii v strukture samosoznaniia vypusknika universiteta. Kontekst i refleksiia, T. 6, 6, 145-155.
  13. 13. Mukin, V. A., & Efremov, O. Iu. (2016). Korreliatsionnye sviazi universitetskogo prostranstva. Kontekst i refleksiia, T. 5, 6, 184-201.
  14. 14. Naumova, O. S. (2017). Gumanitarnoe prostranstvo sovremennogo universiteta i ego prostranstvenno-vremennye resheniia. Voiadzher, 143.
  15. 15. Mukin, V. A. (2018). Potentsial'nye vozmozhnosti universitetskogo prostranstva. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii v nauke i obrazovanii, 154. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshchenie.
  16. 16. Mukin, V. A. (2017). Kontseptsiia universitetskogo sotsial'nogo prostranstva. Kontekst i refleksiia, T.6, 6.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.