En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Monograph
  3. Culture. Science. Education: modern trends
  4. Vnutrenniaia dialogichnost' kategorii budushchego...

Vnutrenniaia dialogichnost' kategorii budushchego vremeni (na primere mediinykh tekstov)

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-74813
Open Access
Monograph «Culture. Science. Education: modern trends»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Culture. Science. Education: modern trends»
Author:
Tatiana A. Sukhomlina 1
Work direction:
Глава 2. Наука
Pages:
81-88
Received: 17 February 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2713
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
For citation:
Vinokurov A. A., Nabokova L. S., Khalina N. V., Anikin D. V., Valiulina E. V., Dorokhov N. I., Stepanova T. I., Tselishcheva Z. A., Kuznetsova E. V., Bezgodov A. V., Kurasova E. A., Kurasova E. A., Stenkina E. N., Savitskaya E. V., Kostenko E. G., Lysenko V. V., Saikina G. K., Kadnikova O. I., Altynbaeva G. K., Aidarkhanov A. M., Toretaev M. O., Valiulin R. R., Valiulina E. V., Sukhomlina T. A., Kasianenko T. G., Vorotilkina A. M., Sergeev T. S., Alisin V. V., Svinukhov V. G., Senotrusova S. V., Zhoglicheva V. V., Tesalovskaia V. E., Sovetova N. P., Aksiutina S. V., Dosbenbetova A. S., Abramova G. I., Iumasheva E. V., Stashkov V. B., Anishchenko N. D., Pospelov A. A., Rozanov K. I., Kolovanov O. A., Dylevskaia L. A., Sovetova N. P., Chaika N. M., & Pavliuk T. P. (2020). Culture. Science. Education: modern trends, 312. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/a-137

Abstract

The article describes the internal dialogic nature of the Future Tense category in mass media texts. On the example of various texts, the author comes to the conclusion that the internal dialogic nature of the category as one of the resources of word creation is becoming more and more vivid in the British mass media texts. As a result of the research, it is an obvious fact for the author that the form of presenting the article to reader in all genres of journalism is changing due to the decrease in ethical and stylistic norms of speech, determined by the progressive democratization of communication. The results of the novelty of the work are presented in the description of the Future Tense category as a complex phenomenon that has different author’s meanings because of the internal dialogue with reader, and determines the journalist's attitude to the presented information. The author of the article tells that the internal dialogic nature of the category is the basis of the future semantics, which is based on the author's desire to describe his beliefs and influence the reader using the language means of the Future Tense category.

References

  1. 1. Кайда Л.Г. Композиционная поэтика публицистики: учебное пособие. – М.: Флинта, 2006. – 144 с.
  2. 2. Клушина Н.И. Публицистический текст в новой системе стилистических координат // Русская речь. – 2008, – №5. – С. 43–46.
  3. 3. Кубрякова Е.С. Виды пространств текста и дискурса / Е.С. Кубрякова, О.В. Александрова // Категоризация мира: пространство и время: мат. науч. конф. / под ред. проф. Е.С. Кубряковой и проф. О.А. Александровой. – М.: Диалог-МГУ, 1997. – 237 с.
  4. 4. Покровская Е.В. Понимание современного газетного текста и его языковые характеристики: автореф. дис. … д-ра филол. наук: 10.02.01. – М., 2004. – 43 с.
  5. 5. Сметанина С.И. Медиа-текст в системе культуры: учебник. – СПб: Изд-во Михайлова В.А., 2002. – 382 с.
  6. 6. Rivers W. The mass media. – N.Y., 1972. – 220 p.
  7. 7. The Daily Mail. February 15, 2011. – 23 p.
  8. 8. The Denver Post. March 9, 2012. – 24 p.
  9. 9. The Economist. January 19th 2013. – 87 p.
  10. 10. Financial Times. June 9, 2014. – 26 p.
  11. 11. Herald International Tribune. December 3–4/ 12–13, 2014. – 24 p.
  12. 12. The Newsweek. June 30, 2014. – 24 p.
  13. 13. The Times. Monday, June 5, 2014. – 26 p.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.