En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Desi...
  4. Strategies of Coping Behaviour of Cadets as a Fact...

Strategies of Coping Behaviour of Cadets as a Factor of Their Professional Formation

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Authors:
Aleksei S. Lotkov 1 , Tatiana I. Skibo 1
Work direction:
The essence of psychological security of the individual
Pages:
22-25
Received: 29 September 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
1897
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Department Military Air Force Education and Research Center "Air Force Academy named after Professor N. E. Zhukovsky and Yu. A. Gagarin"
For citation:
Lotkov A. S., & Skibo T. I. (2020). Strategies of Coping Behaviour of Cadets as a Factor of Their Professional Formation. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects, 22-25. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The results of a comparative study of coping strategies of first and fourth year cadets are reflected. Conclusions are formulated on the predominance of adaptive and conditionally adaptive strategies of coping behavior among cadets, which is important for the formation of their stress resistance and readiness for the performance of combat service tasks.

References

  1. 1. Kriukova, T. L. (2008). Chelovek kak subekt sovladaiushchego povedeniia. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, T. 29, 2, 88-94.
  2. 2. Skibo, T. Iu. (2013). Koping-strategii kak osnova profilaktiki sindroma emotsional'nogo vygoraniia sotrudnikov GPS MChS Rossii. Aktual'nye problemy innovatsionnykh sistem informatizatsii i bezopasnosti, 234-238. Voronezh: Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskii tsentr "Nauchnaia kniga".

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.