En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Desi...
  4. The Level of Hardiness of Individuals with Differe...

The Level of Hardiness of Individuals with Different Strategies of Self-Affirmation as a Factor of Psychologically Safe Educational Environment

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-96504
Open Access
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Author:
Alisa I. Babiy 1
Work direction:
Creating a psychologically comfortable and safe educational environment: technologies, diagnostics, practice, expertise
Pages:
62-69
Received: 14 October 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2359
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 ANO of HE “New Russian University”
For citation:
Babiy A. I. (2020). The Level of Hardiness of Individuals with Different Strategies of Self-Affirmation as a Factor of Psychologically Safe Educational Environment. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects, 62-69. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-96504

Abstract

To create a psychologically safe educational process, the most important components will be the personal characteristics of the participants in the educational process. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of hardiness of future specialists with different strategies of self-affirmation as a fac-tor affecting the psychological safety in the educational environment. It is vitality that is one of the basic characteristics that allows participants in the educational process not only to overcome life circumstances and adapt to constantly changing conditions, but also to become stronger, qualitatively improving the standard of living, physical and psychological health. An analysis of the empirical data obtained was presented, as well as the features of psychological and pedagogical support aimed at increasing the resilience of individuals with different self-affirmation strategies.

References

  1. 1. Al'berti, R. E., & Emmons, M. L. Umeite postoiat' za sebia. Kliuch k uverennomu povedeniiu. Retrieved from http://www.romek.ru/alb.htm
  2. 2. Kazanskaia, V. G., & Solov'ev, A. S. (2008). Formirovanie professional'nogo samoutverzhdeniia studentov v usloviiakh teoreticheskogo obucheniia i na praktike. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina, T. 5.
  3. 3. Klimov, A. A. (2011). Zhiznestoikost' i ee vzaimosviaz' s lichnostnymi tsennostiami studentov. Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriia: Psikhologiia, 2.
  4. 4. Leont'ev, D. A., & Rasskazova, E. I. (2006). Test zhiznestoikosti. M.: Smysl.
  5. 5. Likhacheva, E. V., Ognev, A. S., & Kazakov, K. A. (2013). Zhiznestoikost' i zhiznennye tseli sovremennykh rossiiskikh studentov. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, T. 14. 6, 795-798.
  6. 6. Loginova, M. V. (2010). Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie zhiznestoikosti lichnosti studentov. M.
  7. 7. Nikitin, E. P., & Kharlamenkova, N. E. (2000). Fenomen chelovecheskogo samoutverzhdeniia., 224. SPb.: Aleteiia.
  8. 8. Podymova, L. S., Dolinskaia, L. A., & Shouven', L. (2018). Strategii samoutverzhdeniia studentov v uchebnoi deiatel'nosti. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniia, 3.
  9. 9. Fominova, A. N. (2012). Zhiznestoikost' lichnosti. M.: Prometei.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.