En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Desi...
  4. Conditions for developing a psychologically safe e...

Conditions for developing a psychologically safe educational environment in the new reality, caused by covid-19

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Authors:
Elena V. Panferova 1 , Vesela Kazashka 2
Work direction:
Security of educational activities during quarantine measures
Pages:
297-302
Received: 11 November 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2251
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
2 Academy of Music, Dance and Fine Arts «Prof. Asen Diamandiev»
For citation:
Panferova E. V., & Kazashka V. (2020). Conditions for developing a psychologically safe educational environment in the new reality, caused by covid-19. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects, 297-302. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article introduces an analysis of some conditions for development safe educational environment in the new raelity, in relation with COVID-19. The modern approaches to the educational process in European countries are described. Some ways of solving the problem in the changed conditions in the universities of Bulgaria are revealed. Factors and conditions on which the safe educational environment in the future depends are derived.

References

  1. 1. Селигман М. (2017) Благоденствие. ИК «Хермес». ISBN 978-954-26-1707-5.
  2. 2. Янакиев Ю. (2019) Диагностика на Бърнаут синдром при педагогическите специалисти. Стратегии за справяне с хроничния стрес на работното място УИ «Паисий Хилендарски» 2019. ISBN 978-619-202-529-8. С. 87–89.
  3. 3. Brunstein, J. C. Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, №65 (5), рp. 1061–1070.
  4. 4. Diener, E., & Diener, M. Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, №68, pр. 653–663.
  5. 5. Lazuris R.S., and Folkman S. (1986) Cognitive theories of stress and issue of circukarity. In M H Appley and R Trumbull (Eds), (1986). Dinamics of Stress. Physiological, Psychological and Social Perspectives. New York Plenum, pp. 63–80.
  6. 6. Linley, P.A., Maltby, J., Wood, A.M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C., Park, N., Seligman, M.E.P. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of strengths doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.004
  7. 7. Nelson, Debra L., Simmons, Bret L. (2019) Savoring eustress while coping with distress: The holistic model of stress. PsycINFO Database Record.
  8. 8. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2001) On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic andeudaimonic well-being // Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, №52, pp. 141–166.
  9. 9. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995) The structure of psychological wellbeing revisited. // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, №69 (4), рp. 719–727.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.