Humour Stereotypes and their role in the emergence of interethnic and international conflicts

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-97470
Open Access
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «History of culture, study of art and philology: modern points of view»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «History of culture, study of art and philology: modern points of view»
Author:
Oksana O. Gnezdechko 1
Work direction:
Филология
Pages:
140-144
Received: 22 December 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2349
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FGOU VO "Vladivostokskii gosudarstvennyi universitet ekonomiki i servisa"
For citation:
Gnezdechko O. O. (2020). Humour Stereotypes and their role in the emergence of interethnic and international conflicts. History of culture, study of art and philology: modern points of view, 140-144. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-97470

Abstract

The article examines the main ethnic stereotypes, prerequisites and ways of their formation in a humorous discourse presented by the genre of anecdote. The main means of ethnic prejudices of humorous stereotypes expression, the reasons and methods of their formation are analyzed. A new principle of their classification is given according to the consideration of stereotypes from the standpoint of psycholinguistics. The paper also presents the schemes of humor perception by Russian and German ethnic groups. Using the material of anecdotes as the main form of modern humorous culture, it is shown how these schemes work and how ethnic stereotypes manifest themselves in an anecdote, how the relevance of stereotypes affects the change and disappearance of certain anecdotes from national everyday life. The means of expressing ethnic prejudices in the discourse under consideration are negative-evaluative communicative strategies of value differentiation, distance, and discrediting foreigners.

References

  1. 1. Зайдениц Ш. Эти странные немцы / Ш. Зайдениц, Б. Баркоу. – М.: Эгмонт Россия, 2001. – 72 с.
  2. 2. Ширяева Н. Лингвокогнитивная репрезентация категории комического в немецком языке (на материале типа текста «анекдот»): дис. ... канд. филол. наук: 10.02.04. – М.: РГБ ОД, 2007. – 221 с.
  3. 3. Глобализация – этнизация: этнокультурные и этноязыковые процессы / М.Б. Ешич, А.Ф. Журавлев, Я. Корженский [и др.]; отв. ред. Г.П. Нещименко. В 2 кн. Кн 1. – М.: Наука, 2006. – 486 с.
  4. 4. Berger A. A Blind Men and Elephants. – 1st edition. – Routledge, 1995. – 192 p.
  5. 5. Gruner Ch.R. The game of humor: a comprehensive theory of why we laugh / Ch.R. Gruner. – New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK): Transaction publishers, 1997. – 226 p.
  6. 6. Koestler A. The Act of Creation – Hutchinson and Co, 1964. – 731 p.
  7. 7. Hull D. Who Are You Calling Stupid? – Cord Communications, 1995.
  8. 8. Suls J. Cognitive Processes in Humor Appreciation // A Handbook of Humour Research / Ed. by Paul E. McGhee, Jeffrey H. Goldstein. – Volume 1: Basic Issues. – Springer, New York, NY, 1983. – P. 39–57.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.