Children of an Epoch or a Slave of His Time (about the System of Images and the Image of an Epoch in Literature)

Research Article
EDN: RYYYAG DOI: 10.31483/r-98371
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 4
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 4
Authors:
Albina F. Myshkina 1 , Inessa V. Iadranskaia 2
Work direction:
Special theme of the issue
Pages:
10-19
Received: 7 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 6 May 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
3489
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State Institute of Humanities of Ministry of Education & Youth of Chuvash Republic
2 Chuvash Republican Institute of Education of the Ministry of Education and Youth Policy of the Chuvash Republic
For citation:
UDC 82-312.1

Abstract

In human culture, since ancient times, fiction has developed as a mirror of time. Therefore, a dual understanding of time is reflected in the poetics of the work: firstly, it is the time that is connected with the narrative and is developed in the plot of the work (artistic time), and secondly, it is the time, the epoch of writing the work itself (historical time). The artistic image of the time is reflected not only in historical genres, but also in all other genres and styles of literature. The historical era of writing a work can be captured in the thoughts and worldview of the characters, in the conflict being developed, the subject matter and the problems involved. The relevance of the study is related to the fact that the tragic periods of history depicted in the work must be analyzed through the worldview and moral standarts of the people. In this regard, the purpose of this article is to identify the philosophical and aesthetic connection between the artistic time continuum and the historical epoch. The subject of the research in this article is the novelette of the literary scholar and prose writer Georgy Fedorov “Ai, mantaran hir mulkaci” ("Oh, poor hare »). In the course of the study, the following results were obtained: in an artistic and philosophical work, the category of time becomes both a method of deepening the character's personality, and an indicator of the figurative model of the world, and the subject of research.

References

  1. 1. Abramov, V. (2002). Ai mantaran, khir mulkachi" povest'-eskiz pirki puca kilne shukhashsene cavarni. Tavan Atal, 2, 2-4.
  2. 2. Bakhtin, M.M. (1997). K metodologii literaturovedeniia (1940, 1974). Vvedenie v literaturovedenie. Khrestomatiia: ucheb. posobie dlia un-tov, 350. M.: Vyssh. shk.
  3. 3. Bibler, V.S. (1991). Ot naukoucheniia., 412. M.: Politizdat.
  4. 4. Gordeev, D. (2003). Akhkhaias-makhkhaias. Ialav, 7, 5-56.
  5. 5. Emel'ianova, T.N. (2014). Chuvashskaia proza 60-70-kh godov XX veka: poiski i obretenie novogo ideala. Problemy sozdaniia regional'noi istorii literatur narodov Povolzh'ia, 258-264. Cheboksary.
  6. 6. Zatonskii, D. (1988). Khudozhestvennye orientiry KhKh veka., 416. M.: Sove pisatel'.
  7. 7. Isaev, Iu.N. (2015). Chavashlakh tuiame e cut tenchen tekerne tavcarsa talpanni (takhatla K.V. Ivanov curalnaranpa 125 cul tultarna mai). Konstantin Ivanov i chuvashskii mir: (v kontekste natsional'nykh kul'tur) = Konstantin Ivanov tata chavash tenchi: (natsi kul'turisen kontekstenche), 109-114. Cheboksary: Izd-vo ChGIGN.
  8. 8. Likhachev, D.S. (1968). Vnutrennii mir khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniia. Voprosy literatury, 8, 74-79.
  9. 9. Myshkina, A.F. (2004). G. Fedorovan "Ai mantaran, khir mulkachi" khailavenchi iatsen ytarla peltereshe. Dialekty i istoriia tiurkskikh iazykov vo vzaimodeistvii s drugimi iazykami, 175-178. Cheboksary.
  10. 10. Myshkina, A.F. (2006). Otrazhenie natsional'nykh traditsii v khudozhestvenno-filosofskoi proze. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 1, 358-364.
  11. 11. Myshkina, A.F. (2015). Filosofskoe i poeticheskoe znachenie imion v khudozhestvennom proizvedenii. Khudozhestvennaia kul'tura narodov Volgo-Kamskogo polietnicheskogo regiona v paradigme sovremennosti, 127-130. Ioshkar-Ola.
  12. 12. Myshkina, A.F. (2016). Natsional'naia literatura regiona kak khudozhestvenno-esteticheskaia obshchnost' (iz opyta nachala XX veka). Vestnik Mariiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1 (21), 113-117.
  13. 13. Myshkina, A.F., Zaitseva, T.I., & Emel'ianova, T.N. (2019). Problemy natsional'noi estetiki i literaturnogo tvorchestva v khudozhestvennom prostranstve nachala XXI veka. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, T. 12, 2, 364-367.
  14. 14. Nikiforova, V. (2003). Cene pulam, cene samakh. Tavan Atal, 12, 64-65.
  15. 15. Tallerov, L. (1992). Erkhip manuke Erkhip. Povecsempe kalavsem., 320. Shupashkar: Chavash ken. izd-vi.
  16. 16. Fedorov, G. (2002). Ai, mantaran khir mulkachi. Tavan Atal, 2, 1-23.
  17. 17. Fedorov, G. (2002). Ai, mantaran khir mulkachi. Tavan Atal, 3, 32-53.
  18. 18. Fedorov, G. (2002). Ai, mantaran khir mulkachi. Tavan Atal, 6, 20-44.
  19. 19. Fedorov, G.I. G. Fedorov cyravcan uiram kalacura palartna shukhashesem.
  20. 20. Iakimova, E.R., Chekushkina, E.P., & Sofronova, I.V. (2017). Paradigma traditsionnykh tsennostei v sovremennoi chuvashskoi literature (na primere tvorchestva N. Il'inoi). Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 8, 60-62.
  21. 21. Iakovlev, Iu.V. (2000). Prozari kecen zhanran filosofille sulame-sume. Sanar. Tepchevsem, 65-115. Shupashkar: Chavash pat. gumanitari aslalakhsen instituche.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.