En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Interdisciplinary Potential of Oral History and Ne...
  4. The breakthrough and expansion of modern oral hist...

The breakthrough and expansion of modern oral history on traditional historiography

Proceeding
All-Russian scientific conference «Interdisciplinary Potential of Oral History and New Ways of Developing Historical Knowledge»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian scientific conference «Interdisciplinary Potential of Oral History and New Ways of Developing Historical Knowledge»
Authors:
Chzhen'din Chzhou 1 , Xu Jin 1
Work direction:
Устная история: методологические поиски и новые методы исследований
Pages:
38-42
Received: 20 April 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
2744
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State University
For citation:

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a boom in the study of history using oral narratives in both Chinese and foreign historiography. Oral history, as a form of historical research, has played a unique role in promoting the popularization of historical knowledge among the public, and in the late 1970s Chinese historians began to study oral history. Over the next three decades, the study of oral history has expanded and deepened, and it has developed into a branch of the historical discipline. History is a discipline with a long tradition, and one that is constantly being updated as human society evolves. Each era has its own historiography, and each era has a different style and philosophy from its predecessors. Modern oral history, as a new form of historiography, inherits traditional historiography, but has developed its own unique characteristics in terms of research philosophy and methodology, and its most distinctive feature is its breakthrough and expansion of traditional historiography in many ways. This is mainly manifested in the extending of the object of research in oral history, the significant increase in the content of research, and the move from a single means of research to multiple forms of research.

References

  1. 1. 坎曼．往事历历在目，美国当代历史写作［J］． 世界历史，1998( 6) 79: 392．
  2. 2. 候成德． 美国口碑史料学三十年［J］． 世界史研究动态，1981( 11) : 31．
  3. 3. 熊月之． 口述史的价值［J］． 史林， 2000( 3) : 65．
  4. 4. 托什． 口述的历史［J］． 雍恢，译． 史学理论，1987(4) : 83．
  5. 5. 保罗·汤普森． 过去的声音: 口述史［M］． 覃方明，梁东，张旅平，译． 沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社， 2000: 7–8．
  6. 6. 罗蒂． 哲学诠释学和经历的交流: 口述历史的范型［J］．国外社会科学， 1981( 1) : 42．
  7. 7. 陆象淦． 现代历史科学［M］． 重庆: 重庆出版社，1988:253．
  8. 8. 布洛赫． 为史学而辩护［M］． 巴黎: 巴黎大学出版社，1964: 28．
  9. 9. 贝尔． 史学中的综合． 它同一般综合的关系［M］． 巴黎:巴黎大学出版社， 1953: 36．
  10. 10. 杜赞奇． 从民族国家拯救历史［M］. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社， 2003: 3–4．
  11. 11. Саитова А.М. Отражение развития международных связей ЧГУ им. И.Н. Ульянова с вузами КНР в его летописи / А.М. Саитова, М.Н. Краснова // Актуальные вопросы археологии, этнографии, истории (к 100-летию со дня рождения В.Ф. Каховского и 60-летию Чувашской археологической экспедиции): сборник статей Всероссийской научно-практической конференции (Чебоксары, 20 декабря 2016 г.). – Чебоксары: Интерактив плюс, 2017. – С. 79–82.
  12. 12. Краснова М.Н. Чувашско-китайское сотрудничество (на примере международных контактов между Чувашским государственным университетом и Аньхойским университетом (КНР) / М.Н. Краснова, Линьци Ли // Университетское образование в полиэтничных регионах Поволжья (к 50-летию Чувашского государственного университета имени И.Н. Ульянова): сб. ст. – Чебоксары: Интерактив плюс, 2015. – С. 135–140.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.