En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Ethnic culture"
  3. Vol 4, No 1
  4. On the Problem of Rational Use of the Potential of...

On the Problem of Rational Use of the Potential of the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Crimea: Features of Development Based on the Concept of a Unique Historical Territory

Review Article
EDN: OPRDBS DOI: 10.31483/r-101523
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
Author:
Nikolay V. Nikolaenko 1
Work direction:
Ethnography, Ethnology and Anthropology
Pages:
26-30
Received: 9 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
3833
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Crimean University of Culture, Arts and Tourism
For citation:
Nikolaenko N. V. (2022). On the Problem of Rational Use of the Potential of the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Crimea: Features of Development Based on the Concept of a Unique Historical Territory. Ethnic Culture, 4(1), 26-30. EDN: OPRDBS. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-101523
UDC 379

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of rational use of the potential of natural and cultural heritage objects. The relevance of the article is due to the fact that the development of Crimean tourism and local history organizations urgently requires practical measures to modernize socio- and ethno-cultural activities, and also leads to the search for new forms of interaction with local museums and the development of innovative methods and principles of preserving cultural and historical heritage. The author of the article considers the ecomuseum project "Belbek Valley" as an opportunity to reconstruct the appearance of rural dwellings of the 8-9 centuries. He raises the question of the materialization of such a reconstruction, the creation of a museum complex that will clearly present an early medieval rural settlement. The purpose of the article is to give an idea of the initial stage of design, i.e. the identification of the main objects of the prospective territory of the Crimea, followed by the development of a comprehensive program for the development of the region on the principles of the concept of unique historical territories. The materials for the study were natural monuments, archaeological sites, medieval historical and cultural memorials of the Crimean Peninsula. Based on the method of theoretical analysis, the uniqueness of the ecomuseum project "Belbek Valley" was substantiated. The conclusion of the article is made about the mountainous southwestern part of the Crimean Peninsula as a unique territory, which is a holistic, dispersed museum, full of monuments of nature, history, and culture.

References

  1. 1. Bert'e-Delagard, A. A. (2011). K istorii khristianstva v Krymu. Mnimoe tysiacheletie. Bert'e-Delagard A. A. Izbrannye trudy po istorii khristianstva v Krymu. 274 s, 274. Simferopol': Tavriia.
  2. 2. Garagulia, V. K. (1982). Kratkii slovar' geograficheskikh nazvanii. S. 295-305. Krym: putevoditel'. Simferopol'; Krym: Tavriia.
  3. 3. Gertsen, A. G. (1995). K probleme tipologii srednevekovykh gorodishch Iugo-Zapadnoi Tavriki. Vizantiia i srednevekovyi Krym. ADSV. 27. S. 85-90, 85-90. Simferopol'.
  4. 4. Gertsen, A. G., & Makhneva, O. A. Peshchernye goroda Kryma. Simferopol' : Tavriia, 1989., 104.
  5. 5. Gertsen, A. G., & Mogarichev, Iu. M. (1995). O vremeni i prichinakh vozniknoveniia peshchernykh monastyrei Tavriki. Krymskii muzei. 1. S. 7-13, 7-13. Simferopol'.
  6. 6. Danilenko, V. N. (1994). Monastyrskoe khoziaistvo v Krymu. Problemy istorii i arkheologii Kryma. S. 127-147, 127-147. Simferopol'.
  7. 7. Ena, V. G., & Ena, A. V. Kratkii geograficheskii slovar' Kryma. Simferopol' : Biznes-Inform, 2011. 264 s., 264.
  8. 8. Mogarichev, Iu. M. "Peshchernye goroda" v Krymu. Simferopol' : Sonat, 2008. 192 s.
  9. 9. Nikolaenko, N. V., Shvetsova, A. V., & Shilina, V. A. (2020). Sovremennye problemy razvitiia muzeinogo turizma v Krymu. Prioritetnye napravleniia i problemy razvitiia vnutrennego i mezhdunarodnogo turizma v Rossii. S. 216-221, 216-221. Ialta.
  10. 10. Sotnikova, S. I. Muzeologiia. Moskva : Drofa, 2010. 190 s.
  11. 11. Sedin, N. A. O znachenii krymskikh nazvanii. Simferopol': IT "Arial", 2011. 184 s.
  12. 12. Talis, D. L. Siuren'skaia krepost'. Vizantiiskii vremennik. 1972. 33. S. 218-229.
  13. 13. Shul'gin, P. M. (2000). Kul'turnyi faktor v regional'noi politike. S. 35-43. Ekologiia kul'tury: Al'manakh instituta Naslediia "Territoriia". Moskva.
  14. 14. Shutov, Iu. N. Vody Kryma. Simferopol' : Tavriia, 1979. 96 s.
  15. 15. Iakobson, A. L. Rannesrednevekovye sel'skie poseleniia iugo-zapadnoi Tavriki. Leningrad : Nauka, 1970. 224 s.
  16. 16. Iakobson, A. L. Srednevekovyi Krym : Ocherki istorii i istorii material'noi kul'tury. Moskva ; Leningrad : Nauka, 1964. 232 s.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.