Associative experiment as a means of tracking dynamics of secondary language personality development as exemplified by the stimulus word “nation”

Research Article
EDN: OBLUDL DOI: 10.31483/r-138947
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 7
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 7
Authors:
Vera V. Koroleva 1 , Ekaterina T. Polyanskaya 1
Work direction:
Ethno-Cultural Problems of Education
Pages:
38-42
Received: 25 May 2025 / Accepted: 11 June 2025 / Published: 20 June 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
305
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Vladimir State University
For citation:
Koroleva V. V., & Polyanskaya E. T. (2025). Associative experiment as a means of tracking dynamics of secondary language personality development as exemplified by the stimulus word “nation”. Ethnic Culture, 7(2), 38-42. EDN: OBLUDL. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-138947
UDC 81’23[811.111:378.147]+81’37

Abstract

The article examines the dynamics of secondary language personality formation and the influence of learners’ native linguistic personality on this process. The article reviews the role of associative experiment in linguistic worldview and language personality examination. A chain associative experiment, conducted in three groups with different levels of English proficiency – including a group of native speakers – serves as the primary research method. The lexeme “nation” is used as the stimulus word in the experiment. The interpretation of the results is carried out according to Yu. N. Karaulov’s three-level model of language personality. The findings allow conclusions that there is a strong influence of the native linguistic personality on the formation of the secondary language personality at an early stage of the language mastery and the threshold level (A2–B1). Subjects with a great experience of conscious language acquisition demonstrate the most comprehensive understanding of the stimulus word “nation”, even compared to the native speakers. Furthermore, the prospects of associative experiment application for methodological purposes are noted, particularly for tracking the level of secondary language personality formation in learning groups and adjusting the language learning trajectory.

References

  1. 1. Barabushka, I. A., Krivenko, L. A. (2022). Toponyms Voronezh and Moscow in the linguistic consciousness of non-native English speakers. I. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 3, 11-19. EDN: EULZMO. https://doi.org/10.37972/chgpu.2022.116.3.002
  2. 2. Boguslavskaya, V. V., Budnik, E. A., Mamontov, A. S., Trinh, T. K. N. (2022). Nationally oriented lexicography and rfl training. Russian journal of lexicography, 24, 5-29. EDN: XGXOJA. https://doi.org/10.17223/22274200/24/1
  3. 3. Vardzelashvili, Ja. A., Prokofyeva, L. P. (2022). The formation of a secondary linguistic personality in the space of a foreign language. Philological Class, 27(4), 205-216. EDN: LCHIXX. https://doi.org/10.51762/1FK-2022-27-04-18
  4. 4. Grebennikova, I. A., Glebenko, L. Ju., Kallaur, V. S. (2021). The role of the concept of “Secondary Linguistic Personality” in the process of acculturation. Modern pedagogical education, 9, 133-136. EDN: BUVMUV. https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-8328-2021-9-133-136
  5. 5. Kuzmina, M. A. (2022). Interdisciplinary basis of the study of evaluative associative dominants. Siberian journal of philology, 3, 325-338. EDN: PLTGJH. https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/80/25
  6. 6. Sladkevich, Zh. R. (2022). The influence of the value-cultural matrix on the interpretation of the international holiday by foreign students. Tomsk State University journal of philology, 78, 46-66. EDN: SVHPIN. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/78/3
  7. 7. Sternin, J. A. (2020). Interpretation problems of associative experiments. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 3, 110-125. EDN: EXQMGT. https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2020-45-3-110-125

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.