Specifics of the Mosaic Reflection Method of Elements of Ethnic Culture

Research Article
EDN: UTGGZL DOI: 10.31483/r-74998
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture»
Author:
Iurii A. Kuzmin 1
Work direction:
History and Theory of Art Questions
Pages:
17-19
Received: 13 March 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
3957
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State University
For citation:
Kuzmin I. A. (2020). Specifics of the Mosaic Reflection Method of Elements of Ethnic Culture. Ethnic Culture, 17-19. EDN: UTGGZL. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-74998
UDC 316.7

Abstract

The article reveals the specifics of the methodology for studying ethnic elements of culture. The nomological paradigm of reflection of the socio-humanitarian sphere constituted the scientific status of ethno-cultural knowledge, at the same time leveling the subjective aspects, created a unification of forms and content, which inevitably led to a distortion of its actual parameters. As a tool for overcoming the imperfection of the classical principles of reflecting the phenomena of ethnic culture, they proposed a method of mosaic reconstruction that allows us to identify the relationship between elements of ethnic culture on the basis of common values. Mosaic reconstruction of ethnic culture reveals the logical relationship between its elements, forms of manifestation, and the totality of prerequisites and grounds. In a general sense, the method of mosaic reconstructions involves the following procedures, such as fixing specific ethnic elements of culture, creating a complex of links of ethnocultural integrity, determining the principles of interaction of system elements with the external and internal environment, applying the mechanism for restoring cultural integrity based on the principles of a cultural research program, visualizing a holistic image ethnic culture. The methodology of mosaic reconstruction is based on the fact that culture is the product of a social form of existence that expresses itself in the corresponding spheres of social activity, the restoration of which in its entirety is a necessary condition for creating an exhaustive image of culture. The author comes to the conclusion that mosaic reconstruction of ethnic culture reveals the logical relationship between its elements, forms of manifestation, and the totality of prerequisites and grounds.

References

  1. 1. Bakaeva Zh. Yu., Stepanov A. G., Matveeva O. L. Constants of utopian as the basis of the mythological picture of socio-historical reality // Manuscript. – 2019. – Vol. 12. – №6. – P. 95–98.
  2. 2. Zemlyanova L.M. Contemporary American Communication Studies: Theoretical Concepts, Problems, Forecasts. – M.: Moscow State University, 1995. – 271 p.
  3. 3. Kara-Murza S.G. Manipulation of consciousness. Century XXI. – M.: Algorithm, 2015. – 464 p.
  4. 4. Mole A. Sociodynamics of culture. – M.: Progress, 1973. – 406 p.
  5. 5. Mukin V. A., Sokolova L. Yu. Spiritual orientations of a person in the conditions of knowledge economy // Accounting, analysis and audit in the conditions of digital economy materials of the all-Russian scientific and practical conference. – 2018. – P. 580–587.
  6. 6. Stepanov A. G. Specificity of the rational-analytical level of formation of the picture of socio-historical reality // Bulletin of the Omsk state pedagogical University. Humanitarian research. – 2019. – №3 (24). – P. 53–56.
  7. 7. Stepanov A. G. The theory of reverse projection of Professor E. Z. Feizov in solving the problem of the main question of philosophy. Collection of scientific articles of the Department of philosophy, sociology and pedagogy. Executive editor I. E. Poverinov. – 2019. – P. 14–19.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.