Archaic Motives in Décor of Ingush and Kazakh Felts: Comparative and Contrastive Aspect

Research Article
EDN: YADDQO DOI: 10.31483/r-97476
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 3
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 3
Author:
Olga I. Berdnikova 1
Work direction:
Ethnography, Ethnology and Anthropology
Pages:
6-9
Received: 22 December 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 25 June 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
3280
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 MBEI of PE of Kazan "Child School of Art No. 5"
For citation:
UDC 7.5527

Abstract

The following work examines stylistic peculiarities of Ingush and Kazakh felts, offers the parallels of manufacturing technology as well as traditional décor of Ingush and Kazakh original carpets. The aim of the study is to elicit mutual historically contingent stylistic features of Ingush and Kazakh felts arrangement. In the process of the study we used semantic as well as comparative and contrastive analyses aimed on iconologic method and image discrimination theory. The hypothesis of different felt methods, more archaic ornament elements as well as the technology of its creation, are in fact similar in the art of these people, not being in close kinship, finds its endorsement. These facts justify juxtaposition of the cultures of their ancestors in the beginning of Middle ages when Huns – people of Central Asia decent – took up their residence in North Caucasus. Huns, being the representatives of historical and cultural commune of the barren world, possessed similar points of view on life order. In their notion the structure of the world was controlled by Tengri – the head of God’s pantheon. In nomad’s applied arts he was depicted as a rosette. North Caucasus indigenous population (Scythian Sarmatians and Sarmatian Alans) worshipped Kuar the Sun, the notion of whom merged with the image of Tengri and stuck in well-known visual symbols, found in decorations following their world view. The elements of archaic ornament and the manufacturing technologies in accordance with the succession principle in folk arts carried on through centuries. They formed the base of stylistic peculiarities of modern felts among both Ingush and Kazakh people.

References

  1. 1. Azhigali, S. E. (2019). Kazakhskaia etnograficheskaia shkola vtoroi poloviny XX veka. XIII Kongress antropologov Rossii, . Moskva;; Mardzhani AN RT.
  2. 2. Asanova, B. E. (2009). Kazakhskii khudozhestvennyi voilok kak fenomen kochevoi kul'tury., 38. Almaty.
  3. 3. Berezkin, Iu. E. (2012). Mifologicheskie derev'ia v lesu kul'tury. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 6, 3-18.
  4. 4. Valeev, F. Kh. (2002). Tatarskii narodnyi ornament., 295. Kazan': Tatknigoizdat.
  5. 5. (2015). Dzakharova Z.M.-T. Natsional'noe samosoznanie ingushei., 213. Nazran': Piligrim.
  6. 6. Dzakharova, Z. (2017). M.-T. Voilochnoe ornamental'noe kovrodelie u ingushei. Vestnik Ingushskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta gumanitarnykh nauk im. Ch.E. Arzieva, 1, 168.
  7. 7. Gmyria, L. B. (2002). Gunny na Severnom Kavkaze. Istoriia tatar s drevneishikh vremen: v 7-i tomakh. T. I: Narody stepnoi Evrazii v drevnosti, 552. Kazan': Rukhiiat.
  8. 8. Kliashtornyi, S. G. (2002). Stepnaia imperiia tiurkov i ee nasledniki. Istoriia tatar s drevneishikh vremen: v 7-i tomakh. T. I: Narody stepnoi Evrazii v drevnosti, 552. Kazan': Rukhiiat.
  9. 9. Mukanov, M. S. (1979). Kazakhskie domashnie khudozhestvennye remesla., 120. Alma-Ata: Kazakhstan.
  10. 10. Tsareva, E. G. (2006). Voiloki Evrazii. Kul'turnoe nasledie narodov Tsentral'noi Azii, Kazakhstana i Kavkaza, 226-265. SPb.: Nauka.
  11. 11. Polos'mak, N. V., & Barkova, L. L. (2005). Kostium i tekstil' pazyryktsev Altaia (IV-III vv. do n.e.)., 232. Novosibirsk: Infolio.
  12. 12. Rudenko, S. I. (1968). Drevneishie v mire khudozhestvennye kovry i tkani iz oledenelykh kurganov Gornogo Altaia., 136. M.: Iskusstvo.
  13. 13. Savinov, D. G. (1984). Narody Iuzhnoi Sibiri v drevnetiurkskuiu epokhu., 186. L.
  14. 14. Studenetskaia, E. N. (1979). Uzornye voiloki Kavkaza (v svete istoricheskikh sviazei narodov Kavkaza i Azii). Sovetskaia etnografiia, 1, 105-115.
  15. 15. Tataev, V. A., & Shaban'iants, N. Sh. (1974). Dekorativno-prikladnoe iskusstvo Checheno-Ingushetii., 18. Groznyi: Chech.-Ing. kn. izd-vo.
  16. 16. Tokhtabaeva, Sh. Zh. (2008). Shedevry Velikoi stepi., 240. Almaty: Daik-Press.
  17. 17. Oktiabr'skaia, I. V., Suraganova, Z. K., & Suraganov, S. K. Traditsionnye voiloki kazakhov i sovremennoe kovrodelie. Istoriko-kul'turnoe nasledie. Kraevedenie, S. 189.
  18. 18. Shkliaeva, L. M. (2020). Stilevye osobennosti zolotnogo shit'ia u tatar-misharei Ul'ianovskoi oblasti. Observatoriia kul'tury, T. 17, 2, 140-150.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.